2020
DOI: 10.1787/0e828066-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2018-2021 working time reform in Korea: A preliminary assessment

Abstract: JT03464472 OFDE This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it can be that firms have incentives to demand very long working hours rather than hiring new staff, for instance because of hiring risks due to stringent employment protection legislation. Workers may have incentives to supply very long working hours out of financial necessity and social security coverage gaps (Hijzen & Thewissen, 2020; OECD, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, it can be that firms have incentives to demand very long working hours rather than hiring new staff, for instance because of hiring risks due to stringent employment protection legislation. Workers may have incentives to supply very long working hours out of financial necessity and social security coverage gaps (Hijzen & Thewissen, 2020; OECD, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms with fewer than five employees remain exempt. The 52‐h working limit brings Korea's working time limit in line with the prevailing practice of other OECD countries (Hijzen & Thewissen, 2020).…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations