2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-019-01225-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2016 Lamplugh rock avalanche, Alaska: deposit structures and emplacement dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rock avalanche data do not include possible earthquake-triggered events (three) and each two-part failure is only counted once. Dufresne et al, 2019). This finding highlights the possibility that numerous rock avalanches in glaciated areas may go undetected without systematic examination of repeat satellite imagery.…”
Section: Implications For Glacier Composition and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Rock avalanche data do not include possible earthquake-triggered events (three) and each two-part failure is only counted once. Dufresne et al, 2019). This finding highlights the possibility that numerous rock avalanches in glaciated areas may go undetected without systematic examination of repeat satellite imagery.…”
Section: Implications For Glacier Composition and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This RA occurred on 11 June 2012 and was deposited onto a tributary of the John Hopkins Glacier (Geertsema, 2012). The upper portion of the deposit was sequestered into the ice after its deposition in 2012, as is common of debris inputs in glacier accumulation areas (Dunning et al, 2015). However, the deposit toe remained visible on the surface, likely because it was below the snow line.…”
Section: Tracking New Debris Transportationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Without the associated deposit, bedrock source areas are easily mistaken for glacial cirques (Turnbull and Davies, 2006). Fresh snowfall or wind redistribution of snow can rapidly cover a RA deposit that is many kilometres square in area (Dunning et al, 2015). If this occurs within the accumulation zone the deposit is essentially lost to all surface investigation and nonice-penetrating remote sensing and ground-based techniques until its eventual re-emergence in the ablation zone, after potentially considerable modification by transport processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seismic methods have identified some of the largest supraglacially deposited RAs in recent times (e.g. Lamplugh glacier RA (Dufresne et al, 2019)) which are compiled in a database (IRIS DMC, 2017), and, when combined with manual analysis of satellite imagery, gives information on duration, momenta, potential energy loss, mass and runout trajectory. However, landslides are challenging to detect using seismic methods and event positional accuracy is limited to a 20 -100 km radius, due to the lack of high frequency waves when compared to earthquakes, further inhibited by the low frequencies and long wavelengths of dominant seismic waves worldwide (Ekström and Stark, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%