Crisis Elections, New Contenders and Government Formation 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9780203702062-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2015 Portuguese Legislative Election: Widening the Coalitional Space and Bringing the Extreme Left in

Abstract: This article provides an overview of the Portuguese legislative election held on 4 October 2015 by exploring the economic and political context in which the election took place, the opinion polls, party positions and campaign issues, the results and, finally, the process that led to the formation of the first Socialist minority government supported by far-left parties. Due to this outcome, despite the relative majority of the votes obtained by the incumbent centre-right coalition, we argue that this election r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, only the PDR (Republican Democratic Party, Partido Renovador Democrático) has adopted an unorthodox style of political communication centred on its leader (António Marinho e Pinto) and a strong anti-elite rhetoric. However, these new parties have failed to innovate the Portuguese party system, whereas the main parties have adopted a very conventional electoral campaign, both in terms of style and issues (De Giorgi and Pereira 2016). This is also confirmed by the Chapel Hill expert survey, which includes an item related to the anti-establishment rhetoric adopted by European parties.…”
Section: Populism and The Crisis In Greece Portugal And Spain: The Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Among these, only the PDR (Republican Democratic Party, Partido Renovador Democrático) has adopted an unorthodox style of political communication centred on its leader (António Marinho e Pinto) and a strong anti-elite rhetoric. However, these new parties have failed to innovate the Portuguese party system, whereas the main parties have adopted a very conventional electoral campaign, both in terms of style and issues (De Giorgi and Pereira 2016). This is also confirmed by the Chapel Hill expert survey, which includes an item related to the anti-establishment rhetoric adopted by European parties.…”
Section: Populism and The Crisis In Greece Portugal And Spain: The Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, the authors overlook the inconclusive 2015 election, in which the Popular party lost almost 16% of the votes, and the overall record of a 314day political stalemate that continued even after the repeated 2016 election, temporarily ended only because of the PSOE internal divisions (Salmon, 2017). Similar concerns could be advanced also for the reconstruction of the Irish and Portuguese cases (De Giorgi and Santana-Pereira, 2016;Marsh and Mikhaylov, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Portuguese president is not allowed to dissolve parliament and call new elections during either the six months preceding presidential elections or the first six months of a new parliament. The presidential elections were due to be held in January 2016, while the earliest date the new president could dissolve parliament was April 2016(DE GIORGI and SANTANA-PEREIRA, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%