2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0524-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2014 Ebola virus disease outbreak in Pujehun, Sierra Leone: epidemiology and impact of interventions

Abstract: BackgroundIn July 2014, an outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) started in Pujehun district, Sierra Leone. On January 10th, 2015, the district was the first to be declared Ebola-free by local authorities after 49 cases and a case fatality rate of 85.7 %. The Pujehun outbreak represents a precious opportunity for improving the body of work on the transmission characteristics and effects of control interventions during the 2014–2015 EVD epidemic in West Africa.MethodsBy integrating hospital registers and contac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
67
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While the early stage of the epidemic is probably not overly affected by asymptomatic infections, acquired immunity may play a role in speeding up the elimination of the disease. Notwithstanding the mentioned limitations, the model is able to adequately describe the dynamics of the epidemic in Guinea, provide estimates of transmission by setting in agreement with reported data [6], and capture the highly heterogeneous pattern of transmission reported in previous studies [6, 7]. These findings support our choice of using an individual-based modeling approach, capturing the observed high heterogeneity in the number of secondary infections and the clustering effect due to the low number of effective contacts in the different settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the early stage of the epidemic is probably not overly affected by asymptomatic infections, acquired immunity may play a role in speeding up the elimination of the disease. Notwithstanding the mentioned limitations, the model is able to adequately describe the dynamics of the epidemic in Guinea, provide estimates of transmission by setting in agreement with reported data [6], and capture the highly heterogeneous pattern of transmission reported in previous studies [6, 7]. These findings support our choice of using an individual-based modeling approach, capturing the observed high heterogeneity in the number of secondary infections and the clustering effect due to the low number of effective contacts in the different settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…From data reported to WHO, the age-specific incidence of Ebola is notably higher among adults versus children in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone [7, 1416]. Therefore, the model allows children aged 0–14 years to have a different risk of infection compared to individuals aged 15 years or older [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals are assigned to specific households, and households are linked to create “extended households” as are typical in rural Africa. The model is an extension of a model used to simulate interventions during the 2014 outbreak [9]. We used microsimulations to explicitly model Ebola transmission within households and extended households (35.9% and 38.5% of transmission in Pujehun district, respectively; 74.4% of transmission combined) and in the general community, including non-household and health care-related contacts (25.6% of transmission) [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also consider a more optimistic scenario where we assume that 90% of contacts can be identified through contact tracing. This assumption stems from the observation that most of non-family transmission events in Pujehun district were observed among friends [9] and thus they could be potentially traceable, at least to some extent. The relative proportions of transmissions are consistent with findings from other West African regions [8, 15, 16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation