2011
DOI: 10.3167/np.2011.150208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2011 Swedish Supreme Court Ruling: A Turning Point for Saami Rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the rights to the land (for herding, fishing and hunting) are tied to reindeer herding and the continued use of the land Labba 2017). A collapse of reindeer husbandry could mean that the usufructuary rights of the reindeer herders become further questioned by other land users, as has already happened in several court cases in Sweden (Sasvari & Beach 2011).…”
Section: Risks Of Future Regime Shifts In Reindeer Husbandrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, the rights to the land (for herding, fishing and hunting) are tied to reindeer herding and the continued use of the land Labba 2017). A collapse of reindeer husbandry could mean that the usufructuary rights of the reindeer herders become further questioned by other land users, as has already happened in several court cases in Sweden (Sasvari & Beach 2011).…”
Section: Risks Of Future Regime Shifts In Reindeer Husbandrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legislation in relation to conflicts between land owners and reindeer herding districts in all three countries is generally weak, and many conflicts have ended up in the courts (e.g. Sasvari & Beach 2011;Brännström 2018, see also Chapter 8). While recent legal developments relating to Sámi rights in Sweden could potentially remedy some of these structural imbalances , the Swedish state's record consistently demonstrates empty talk over actual implementation (Mörkenstam 2019).…”
Section: Risks Of Future Regime Shifts In Reindeer Husbandrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These disputes have led to legal cases being brought from all sides, yet it can be difficult for Indigenous groups to give evidence in court if their knowledge and ways of tracking change in their environment are not always seen as 'credible' (Keskitalo 1976;Biber 2010;Todd 2016). For example, in order to maintain certain rights, Sámi have been required to prove land use either since 'time immemorial', or continually over the span of 90 years (Bengtsson 2004;Sasvari and Beach 2011). Proving this has often hinged on the presence of archaeological data or sparse written records in settler institutions, rather than forms of knowledge which have long been used in Sámi institutions such as 'landscape memory' written about by Sámi scholar Klemetti Näkkäläjärvi (2008).…”
Section: Making Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%