2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2010 referendum and parliamentary elections in Kyrgyzstan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In October 2010 parliamentary elections were held under the new constitution. In the end only five of the 29 competing parties were able to master both the national (5%) and regional (0.5%) hurdles and move into the parliament (Huskey and Hill, 2011). Since then three governing coalitions have broken down.…”
Section: Case Study 2: Kyrgyzstanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In October 2010 parliamentary elections were held under the new constitution. In the end only five of the 29 competing parties were able to master both the national (5%) and regional (0.5%) hurdles and move into the parliament (Huskey and Hill, 2011). Since then three governing coalitions have broken down.…”
Section: Case Study 2: Kyrgyzstanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the 1999 referendum in East Timor, Paris (: 219) criticises the United Nations administration for organising a premature referendum on independence before providing security on the ground. Thousands of East Timorese were killed and about 400,000 displaced (Paris : 219; Schulze : 78), while in Kyrgyzstan the constitutional referendum of 2010 led to an estimated 400–500 dead and about 100,000 Uzbek refugees (Huskey & Hill ). Thus, premature and ‘wrongly’ designed referendums could inadvertently turn into conflict‐inducing, rather than conflict‐mitigating, opportunities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%