2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00530.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2008 May burst activation of SGR 1627–41

Abstract: In May 2008 the soft gamma-ray repeater SGR 1627-41 resumed its bursting activity after nearly a decade of quiescence. After detection of a bright burst, Swift pointed its X-ray telescope in the direction of the source in less than five hours and followed it for over five weeks. In this paper we present an analysis of the data from these Swift observations and an XMMNewton one performed when SGR 1627-41 was still in a quiescent state. The analysis of the bursts detected with Swift/BAT shows that their temporal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
73
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(59 reference statements)
8
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the very large field of view (the entire unocculted sky) of GBM, this is the largest uniform sample of temporal and spectral properties of SGR J1550−5418 bursts during the January activation. This data set enables us to determine their durations, spectral shapes, and energetics, and compare them with other magnetar sources during similar high bursting activity periods: SGR 1900+14 (Göǧüş et al 1999;Israel et al 2008), SGR 1806−20 (Göǧüş et al 2000), AXP 1E 2259+586 (Gavriil et al 2004), and SGR 1627−41 (Esposito et al 2008). We also compare our results with the analysis of bursts detected by Swift during the same time period (Scholz & Kaspi 2011), and discuss them in the framework of current theoretical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Given the very large field of view (the entire unocculted sky) of GBM, this is the largest uniform sample of temporal and spectral properties of SGR J1550−5418 bursts during the January activation. This data set enables us to determine their durations, spectral shapes, and energetics, and compare them with other magnetar sources during similar high bursting activity periods: SGR 1900+14 (Göǧüş et al 1999;Israel et al 2008), SGR 1806−20 (Göǧüş et al 2000), AXP 1E 2259+586 (Gavriil et al 2004), and SGR 1627−41 (Esposito et al 2008). We also compare our results with the analysis of bursts detected by Swift during the same time period (Scholz & Kaspi 2011), and discuss them in the framework of current theoretical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…It has been suggested that this SGR is associated with the young SNR G337.0-0.1 in the CTB33 complex (Hurley et al 1999), shown in Figure 9. SGR1627-41 last went into outburst in 2008 (Esposito et al 2008), and it was found to have returned to quiescence by 2011 in NARCS observations . The cross-normalization constant from fitting the NuSTAR and Chandra spectra is consistent with 1.0 at 90% confidence, indicating that the magnetar persists in quiescence and has not significantly decreased in flux since 2011.…”
Section: Magnetarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In quiescence, luminosities as low as ∼ 10 31 erg s −1 have been observed. The outburst duty cycle of transient AXPs/SGRs is still poorly known: multiple out-bursts have been observed only in SGR 1627−41 and 1E 1547.0−5408 [46,11].…”
Section: Observational Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%