The 2008‐2009 Presidential Transition: Preparing Federal Agencies

Abstract

While scholars study the transitions into office of new presidents and their teams, there has been less interest in how sitting presidents and their administrations prepare to leave office. The 2008‐2009 transition is particularly important to study because the preparations made by the incumbent president began earlier than previously was the case and involved all agencies in the administration. Clay Johnson, former deputy director for management in the Office of Management and Budget, was charged in April 2008 with preparing federal agencies for the transition. In this essay, he explains how the administration did so. First, Johnson discussed responsibilities and timetables for the transition preparations with the 22 agency members of the President's Management Council. Then, in July, based on information generated in the council sessions, Johnson sent a letter to agencies with goals for the transition and guidelines for achieving them. He and Gail Lovelace, the transition official in the General Services Administration working with career employees, subsequently made certain that their goals were met.

Status and expertise: A typology of US presidential transition team members

“…Outsider status may also help when there is a transition between parties, as has been the case in all but one presidential transition (the transition between Republican Ronald Reagan and his Republican vice president, George H. W. Bush, in 1988) over the last four decades. This is because a large function played by the transition team is interfacing with outgoing political appointees (Johnson, 2009; Resh, 2014). To ease friction between loyalists to the outgoing administration and loyalists to the incoming one, an outsider can bring a degree of independence, bipartisanship, and political neutrality that might breed trust and comity (Kumar, 2013).…”

President Trump as Manager: Reflections on the First Year

“…Existing transition materials provide insights for new administrations on how to staff the White House and how to succeed in the appointments process (see, e.g., Johnson ; Kumar ). They include details about how past administrations have managed their relations with the bureaucracy, developed a legislative strategy, and dealt with the immediate need to adjust the budget prepared by the last administration.…”

The Contemporary Presidency: The Personnel Process in the Modern Presidency

“…6 6 Whereas, the continuing professional parts of the institutional presidency, such as the Bureau of the Budget, previously contributed transition advice, presidents now largely rely on advice from partisans from previous administrations and, to a lesser extent, academics working through organizations such as the American Society of Public Administration and the White House Transition Project. In addition, recent presidents have worked hard to ease the transition of their successors (Burke 2009; Johnson 2008, 2009). …”