2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2007 eruption of Stromboli volcano: Insights from real-time measurement of the volcanic gas plume CO2/SO2 ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
112
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
12
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the figure, we compare our lidar-based CO 2 fluxes with independent estimates, in which the CO 2 flux was derived by multiplying the CO 2 /SO 2 ratio of the plume by the SO 2 flux. This latter approach has been used at volcanoes for years (Aiuppa, 2015), and at Stromboli involves use of two fully automated Multi-GAS instruments, operating on the volcano's summit to measure the in-plume CO 2 /SO 2 ratio (Figure 2A; Aiuppa et al, 2009Aiuppa et al, , 2010aCalvari et al, 2014). This is combined with SO 2 fluxes, delivered from either the FLAMES network of scanning UV spectrometers (Burton et al, 2009) or from UV camera observations (Tamburello et al, 2012), to obtain the CO 2 flux.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the figure, we compare our lidar-based CO 2 fluxes with independent estimates, in which the CO 2 flux was derived by multiplying the CO 2 /SO 2 ratio of the plume by the SO 2 flux. This latter approach has been used at volcanoes for years (Aiuppa, 2015), and at Stromboli involves use of two fully automated Multi-GAS instruments, operating on the volcano's summit to measure the in-plume CO 2 /SO 2 ratio (Figure 2A; Aiuppa et al, 2009Aiuppa et al, , 2010aCalvari et al, 2014). This is combined with SO 2 fluxes, delivered from either the FLAMES network of scanning UV spectrometers (Burton et al, 2009) or from UV camera observations (Tamburello et al, 2012), to obtain the CO 2 flux.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful Multi-GAS measurements of plume composition on Stromboli (Aiuppa et al, 2009(Aiuppa et al, , 2010b are restricted to periods when the volcanic plume is dispersed by the local wind field into the Pizzo area, where the instruments are deployed (see Figure 2A). In addition, the Multi-GAS cannot operate continuously, but only during four equally spaced measurement cycles per day, each being 30 min long (Aiuppa et al, 2009). As such, the temporal resolution of the FIGURE 7 | Temporal record of the volcanic SO 2 flux from Stromboli on June 26 th, 2015, as derived from our UV camera observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, 4). Although this gives support to the validity of the method, introducing an arbitrary threshold of anomalous deformation of the crater terrace between background activity and unrest would just push this issue into a different parameter with respect to those proposed already by several authors (Aiuppa et al 2009;Casagli et al 2007;Ripepe et al 2009;Aiuppa et al 2011;Inguaggiato et al 2011;Coppola et al 2012;Calvari et al 2014;Di Traglia et al 2014b). More significantly, evident differences were produced concerning the characteristics of the crater terrace inflation during the three periods of volcanic unrest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…On average, during the background activity, the explosions occur at a rate of \10 events/hour, shifting to a rate of [14 events/hour during unrests (measured by thermal cameras, Calvari et al 2014). This shift is commonly associated with changes in the features of the erupted products Houghton 2005, 2007;D'Oriano et al 2011) and in the parameters monitored by the geophysical (Casagli et al 2007;Ripepe et al 2009;Calvari et al 2014;Coppola et al 2012;Di Traglia et al 2014b) and geochemical monitoring network (Aiuppa et al 2009(Aiuppa et al , 2011Inguaggiato et al 2011). Modeling ground displacements collected at Stromboli by the GBInSAR from January 2010 to August 2014 revealed a deformation source at 482 ± 46 m a.s.l.…”
Section: Geological and Volcanological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7b-c). This is substantially coeval with the opening of a new effusive fissure at the base of NE crater that marks the ceasing of the typical Strombolian activity at summit vents (Aiuppa et al, 2009;Ripepe et al, 2009). Following this event tremor amplitude decrease and infrasonic puffing dropped to zero.…”
Section: Radon Mapping During Lava Effusions : 2002-3003 and 2007mentioning
confidence: 91%