2020
DOI: 10.1038/s43246-020-0014-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The +2 oxidation state of Cr incorporated into the crystal lattice of UO2

Abstract: Doping by Cr is used to improve the performance of uranium dioxide (UO 2)-based nuclear fuel. However, the mechanism of structural incorporation of Cr remains unclear. Here, in order to understand this process on the atomic scale and the redox state of Cr in UO 2-based nuclear fuel, we performed intensive ab initio atomistic simulations of the Cr doped UO 2 matrix. We unexpectedly found that Cr in UO 2 exists as Cr 2+ species and not as the widely claimed Cr 3+. We re-evaluated previously published x-ray absor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same concentration from the present study, the experimentally determined Δ a / a derived from Rietveld refinements against XRD data of 0 and 1000 ppm Cr was −3.08 × 10 −3 for WCM −420 kJ/mol O 2 , –0.52 × 10 −3 for WCM −510 kJ/mol O 2 , −1.86 × 10 −3 for CPM −420 kJ/mol O 2 and −0.72 × 10 −3 for CPM −510 kJ/mol O 2 . Compared to the value reported by [ 24 ], the values were somewhat consistent for more reducing conditions, but an order of magnitude difference was observed for oxidizing. However as shown by this investigation, the solubility of Cr is oxygen potential dependent, such that varying the oxygen potential will result in variable amounts of Cr entering the matrix and subsequently effecting the lattice parameter to different degrees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…At the same concentration from the present study, the experimentally determined Δ a / a derived from Rietveld refinements against XRD data of 0 and 1000 ppm Cr was −3.08 × 10 −3 for WCM −420 kJ/mol O 2 , –0.52 × 10 −3 for WCM −510 kJ/mol O 2 , −1.86 × 10 −3 for CPM −420 kJ/mol O 2 and −0.72 × 10 −3 for CPM −510 kJ/mol O 2 . Compared to the value reported by [ 24 ], the values were somewhat consistent for more reducing conditions, but an order of magnitude difference was observed for oxidizing. However as shown by this investigation, the solubility of Cr is oxygen potential dependent, such that varying the oxygen potential will result in variable amounts of Cr entering the matrix and subsequently effecting the lattice parameter to different degrees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…However as shown by this investigation, the solubility of Cr is oxygen potential dependent, such that varying the oxygen potential will result in variable amounts of Cr entering the matrix and subsequently effecting the lattice parameter to different degrees. Accordingly, it is difficult to corroborate the proposed structural redox scheme of Cr 2+ with U 5+ and an oxygen vacancy surrounding it by [ 24 ] via measurement of the lattice parameter due to its dependence on the oxygen potential. Subsequently, it is argued that for true determination of the structural and redox state within the matrix of Cr doped UO 2 , direct measurement of the crystal lattice ideally via grain or a single crystal samples is necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first part in the square bracket reflects the vacancy migration probability contribution to the pre-exponential factor derived by Bukaemskiy et al (2021). The attempt frequency ν 0 was estimated from the computation of phonon spectra of the initial (IS) and transition states (TS), as (Beridze and Kowalski, 2014;Beridze et al, 2016;Kvashnina et al, 2018;Sun et al, 2020) we see strong dependence on the Fe redox state, with the U parameter for Fe(III) being ∼0.5 eV larger than for Fe(II). This is well-consistent with previous studies of FePO 4 and LiFePO 4 phases by Maxisch and Ceder (2006), who obtained 4.9 and 3.7 eV for both phases (taken as effective value, U eff = U − J), respectively.…”
Section: Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%