1984
DOI: 10.1126/science.225.4659.288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 1984 Morgan Hill, California, Earthquake

Abstract: The Morgan Hill, California, earthquake (magnitude 6.1) of 24 April 1984 ruptured a 30-kilometer-long segment of the Calaveras fault zone to the east of San Jose. Although it was recognized in 1980 that an earthquake of magnitude 6 occurred on this segment in 1911 and that a repeat of this event might reasonably be expected, no short-term precursors were noted and so the time of the 1984 earthquake was not predicted. Unilateral rupture propagation toward the south-southeast and an energetic late source of seis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus it is likely that this fault segmentation acted to terminate rupture of the 1984 Morgan Hill earthquake to the southeast. This possibility had been recognized previously [ Bakun et al , 1984; Beroza and Spudich , 1988]; however, the fault trace at the surface and at depth do not correspond very closely and it was not necessarily clear from the seismicity what the depth extent of the fault offset was. From the relocated seismicity it is clear that the fault discontinuity extends over the same range as slip in the main shock.…”
Section: A Fault Discontinuitymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Thus it is likely that this fault segmentation acted to terminate rupture of the 1984 Morgan Hill earthquake to the southeast. This possibility had been recognized previously [ Bakun et al , 1984; Beroza and Spudich , 1988]; however, the fault trace at the surface and at depth do not correspond very closely and it was not necessarily clear from the seismicity what the depth extent of the fault offset was. From the relocated seismicity it is clear that the fault discontinuity extends over the same range as slip in the main shock.…”
Section: A Fault Discontinuitymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It is well known that radiated seismic energy is concentrated in the rupture direction due to the so‐called directivity effect. Because the rupture direction of the 1984 Morgan Hill earthquake is to the SE (Bakun et al 1984), we expect larger ground motions and hence larger temporal changes for station in that direction. For example, stations CAL, CSC, and CMH are all close to active FZs, but the observed temporal changes are not as large as that of CCO, which could be due to the fact that these stations were not in the rupture direction of the Morgan Hill main shock, and hence experienced relatively small strong ground motions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has generated at least 14 earthquakes with M > 5 since 1850 (Oppenheimer et al 1990; Manaker et al 2005), with the most recent M w 5.6 event near Alum Rock on 2007 October 31. The largest event was the M L 6.2 1984 April 24 Morgan Hill earthquake that ruptured the central portion of the Calaveras fault (Bakun et al 1984; Fig. 1).…”
Section: Background and Repeating Cluster Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas slip in the Coyote Lake event apparently was concentrated in a circular zone at 5-to-10 depth (Liu and Helmberger, 1983), slip in the Morgan Hill event was concentrated at the ends of the 15-to-20 km long rupture, with little slip near the center of the rupture length (Hartzell and Heaton, 1986). Nearly all of the strong ground motions were generated in the 1-meter slip at the end of the rupture (Bakun et al, 1984). Hazard models should encompass these examples and conform, in a statistical sense, to the distribution of nearly-constant 30-bar stress drops documented for crustal strike-slip earthquakes in numerous publications (e.g., Thatcher and Hanks, 1973;Hanks and Bakun, 2002).…”
Section: Working Group 2002mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC is characterized by abundant microseismicity (Bakun, 1980(Bakun, , 1984others, 1986: 1985;Oppenheimer et al, 1990), which may reflect the high rate of creep. The simple average creep rate from 1968 to 1999 is 16.3 mm/yr (Galehouse and Lienkaemper, 2002), although this value includes slip possibly triggered by the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake (Galehouse, 1997).…”
Section: Working Group 2002mentioning
confidence: 99%