The 1908 Tunguska event and forestfalls

New data on accounts of the 1908 Tunguska event

“…The reported size of the fallen tree area is close to the size of the 'total uprooting' area -see [Ol'khovatov, 2021], and should not be confused with the area (about ~2150 sq. km) where even minor traces of the forest-fall (assigned to the event) were discovered.…”

“…So questions, questions, questions… At 2 p.m. between Kirensk and N-Karelinskoe (closer to Kirensk) there was an ordinary thunderstorm with heavy rain and hail. Also as it was shown in [Ol'khovatov, 2021b] some peculiar phenomena took place several dozens kilometers to the west from Kirensk in the first half of June 30. So the question about the 'slowdescending luminous body' is still open… Now let's search for possible 'pillar of fire' (reported from Kirensk) in the account by Vakulin -a head of the Nizhne-Ilimskoe post-office (see early):…”

“…It is interesting to note that the shape of the Kulikovskii forestfall resembles the one which is produced by a downburst. The shape of the Chuvar forestfall [Ol'khovatov, 2021] resembles the one which is produced by a burst-swath (about the burst-swath see [Fujita, 1981]). Couldn't a "collision" between them to result in the weak destruction to the west from the epicenter?…”

“…It is interesting that authors of [Anfinogenov, and Budaeva, 1998a] evaluate the accounts in the following way, translated by A.O. (see also [Ol'khovatov, 2021] for details):…”

“…This paper is a continuation of a series of works in English, devoted to various aspects of the 1908 Tunguska event [Ol'khovatov, 2003;2020a;2020b;2021;2022;2023]. It is devoted to the Evenki accounts of the 1908 Tunguska event collected in 1920s -1930s.…”