The 15° face-changing acetabular component for treatment of osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip

Pedowitz, Robert A.; Yamaguchi, Ken; Ahmad, Christopher S.; Burks, Robert T.; Flatow, Evan L.; Green, Andrew; Wies, Janet L.; Andre, Justin St; Boyer, Kevin; Iannotti, Joseph P.; Miller, Bruce S.; Tashjian, Robert Z.; Watters, William C.; Weber, Kristy; Turkelson, Charles M.; Raymond, Laura; Sluka, Patrick; McGowan, Richard

doi:10.1302/0301-620x.94b2.27348

Cited by 27 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…22,46,62 Conservative therapies are generally considered the first-line choice for managing shoulder pain. 54 Manual therapy, including spinal thrust manipulation (TM), is one treatment option that conservative treatment programs have incorporated. Studies of manual therapy show promising findings suggesting that manual therapy may be beneficial in the treatment of some individuals with shoulder pain.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Comparative Effects of Spinal and Peripheral Thrust Manipulation and Exercise on Pain Sensitivity and the Relation to Clinical Outcome: A Mechanistic Trial Using a Shoulder Pain Model

Coronado¹,

Bialosky²,

Bishop³

et al. 2015

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

STUDY DESIGN Single-blind randomized trial. OBJECTIVES To compare the effects of cervical and shoulder thrust manipulation (TM) and exercise on pain sensitivity, and to explore associations with clinical outcomes in patients with shoulder pain. BACKGROUND Experimental studies indicate that spinal TM has an influence on central pain processes, supporting its application for treatment of extremity conditions. Direct comparison of spinal and peripheral TM on pain sensitivity has not been widely examined. METHODS Seventy-eight participants with shoulder pain (36 female; mean ± SD age, 39.0 ± 14.5 years) were randomized to receive 3 treatments of cervical TM (n = 26), shoulder TM (n = 27), or shoulder exercise (n = 25) over 2 weeks. Twenty-five healthy participants (13 female; mean ± SD age, 35.2 ± 11.1 years) were assessed to compare pain sensitivity with that in clinical participants at baseline. Primary outcomes were changes in local (eg, shoulder) and remote (eg, tibialis anterior) pressure pain threshold and heat pain threshold occurring over 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes were shoulder pain intensity and patient-rated function at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Analysis-of-variance models and partial-correlation analyses were conducted to examine comparative effects and the relationship between measures. RESULTS At baseline, clinical participants demonstrated lower local (mean difference, −1.63 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.40, −0.86) and remote pressure pain threshold (mean difference, −1.96 kg; 95% CI: −3.09, −0.82) and heat pain threshold (mean difference, −1.15°C; 95% CI: −2.06, −0.24) compared to controls, suggesting enhanced pain sensitivity. Following intervention, there were no between-group differences in pain sensitivity or clinical outcome (P>.05). However, improvements were noted, regardless of intervention, for pressure pain threshold (range of mean differences, 0.22–0.32 kg; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.43), heat pain threshold (range of mean differences, 0.30–0.58; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.96), pain intensity (range of mean differences, −1.79 to −1.45; 95% CI: −2.34, −0.94), and function (range of mean differences, 3.15–3.82; 95% CI: 0.69, 6.20) at all time points. We did not find an association between pain sensitivity changes and clinical outcome (P>.05). CONCLUSION Clinical participants showed enhanced pain sensitivity, but did not respond differently to cervical or peripheral TM. In fact, in this sample, cervical TM, shoulder TM, and shoulder exercise had similar pain sensitivity and clinical effects. The lack of association between pain sensitivity and clinical pain and function outcomes suggests different (eg, nonspecific) pain pathways for clinical benefit following TM or exercise.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Comparative Effects of Spinal and Peripheral Thrust Manipulation and Exercise on Pain Sensitivity and the Relation to Clinical Outcome: A Mechanistic Trial Using a Shoulder Pain Model

Coronado¹,

Bialosky²,

Bishop³

et al. 2015

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Zahos и соавт. [39] на основе анализа данных литературы и своего опыта пришли к заключению, что стабильность полусферического АК может быть достигнута только в случае максимального его покрытия костью. Авторы отметили, что это результат клинических наблюдений, а научного обоснования, к сожалению, в литературе они не нашли.…”

Section: материал и методыunclassified

“…Широкое внедрение ввинчивающихся чашек при ЭПТБС в стандартных ситуациях началось в 90-х годах прошлого столетия, а у больных ДК -с 2000-х годов [48,51]. Активными пропагандистами применения ввинчивающихся чашек при ДК были H. Mittelmeir, H. Cameron и другие ортопеды, считающие их в данном случае более надежными благодаря перераспределению нагрузки на периферические отделы костного ложа ВВ [29,[39][40][41].…”

Section: материал и методыunclassified

Problematic issues of acetabular component selection with endoprosthetics of patients with dysplastic coxarthrosis (review of literature)

Loskutov¹

2018

ORTHOPAEDICS, TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…By 14 days after seeding with human adipose stem cells, cells 90 (B) have infiltrated through the full thickness of the scaffold, and early evidence of new collagen matrix synthesis through the full thickness of the scaffold (C) is identified by Fast Green staining. Bar = 100μm.…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

Current Status of Tissue-engineered Scaffolds for Rotator Cuff Repair

Chainani

Little

2016

Techniques in Orthopaedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rotator cuff tears continue to be at significant risk for re-tear or for failure to heal after surgical repair despite the use of a variety of surgical techniques and augmentation devices. Therefore, there is a need for functionalized scaffold strategies to provide sustained mechanical augmentation during the critical first 12-weeks following repair, and to enhance the healing potential of the repaired tendon and tendon-bone interface. Tissue engineered approaches that combine the use of scaffolds, cells, and bioactive molecules towards promising new solutions for rotator cuff repair are reviewed. The ideal scaffold should have adequate initial mechanical properties, be slowly degrading or non-degradable, have non-toxic degradation products, enhance cell growth, infiltration and differentiation, promote regeneration of the tendon-bone interface, be biocompatible and have excellent suture retention and handling properties. Scaffolds that closely match the inhomogeneity and non-linearity of the native rotator cuff may significantly advance the field. While substantial pre-clinical work remains to be done, continued progress in overcoming current tissue engineering challenges should allow for successful clinical translation.

show abstract

The 15° face-changing acetabular component for treatment of osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip

Cited by 27 publications

References 35 publications

The Comparative Effects of Spinal and Peripheral Thrust Manipulation and Exercise on Pain Sensitivity and the Relation to Clinical Outcome: A Mechanistic Trial Using a Shoulder Pain Model

The Comparative Effects of Spinal and Peripheral Thrust Manipulation and Exercise on Pain Sensitivity and the Relation to Clinical Outcome: A Mechanistic Trial Using a Shoulder Pain Model

Problematic issues of acetabular component selection with endoprosthetics of patients with dysplastic coxarthrosis (review of literature)

Current Status of Tissue-engineered Scaffolds for Rotator Cuff Repair

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About