2007
DOI: 10.1667/rr0554.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: Design, Epidemiological Methods and Descriptive Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A healthy worker effect is often observed in occupational cohorts, especially in nuclear workers Vrijheid et al, 2007b;Hammer et al, 2008;Muirhead et al, 2009;SchubauerBerigan et al, 2015). This well-known effect is generally due to various employment-related components, mainly the healthy hire effect that occurs as healthy people are more likely to enter the workforce than less healthy people and the healthy survivor effect that refers to the process whereby healthy workers remain employed longer than less healthy workers (Howe et al, 1988;Baillargeon, 2001).…”
Section: Cancer Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A healthy worker effect is often observed in occupational cohorts, especially in nuclear workers Vrijheid et al, 2007b;Hammer et al, 2008;Muirhead et al, 2009;SchubauerBerigan et al, 2015). This well-known effect is generally due to various employment-related components, mainly the healthy hire effect that occurs as healthy people are more likely to enter the workforce than less healthy people and the healthy survivor effect that refers to the process whereby healthy workers remain employed longer than less healthy workers (Howe et al, 1988;Baillargeon, 2001).…”
Section: Cancer Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Populations of nuclear workers are particularly relevant to study potential health effects of low dose and low dose-rate exposures to IR, and cohorts of nuclear workers were implemented worldwide (Vrijheid et al, 2007b). The interest of these studies relies in particular on the availability of individual annual occupational doses monitored in the frame of the radiation protection surveillance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such situation one could immediately say that conventional least-square fitting must lead to the parameters of the fit that may not be reliable. It could be suspected that the conclusions reached in papers [3] were due to a few "outliers" in the data. In fact, in the data considered one cannot directly say which points should be treated as outliers just because of the scatter of the data.…”
Section: "Outliers" and Curve Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scatter of points presented in original papers [3], that were intended to show that the risk of cancer death increases with the dose absorbed by workers, by far exceeded declared experimental uncertainties. These points exhibited also uneven distribution of points along abscissa axis.…”
Section: "Outliers" and Curve Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu çalışma dozimetre ölçümlerinin net olması, farklı etnik grupları içermesi ve ortalama dozun BT 'de alınan doza çok yakın olması nedeniyle değerli bir veri sunmaktadır. Öte yandan, mortalitenin sadece Kanada'daki işçilerde görülmesi ve farklılığın akciğer kanserindeki artıştan kaynaklanıyor olması, sigara gibi çevresel faktörlerin etkisi hesaba katılmadığı için verilerin değerini azaltmaktadır (23).…”
Section: Radyasyonunclassified