1986
DOI: 10.1097/00006247-198605000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 12-hour shift is both cost effective to hospitals and advantageous for nurses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When long shifts were frst introduced, the assumption was that they would save money and allow deploying the workforce more efciently by reducing overlaps between shifts while increasing quality and safety of care. Tis was due to the belief that by scheduling two 12+ hour shifts instead of three 8hour shifts, patients would beneft from increased continuity of care across 24 hours [13][14][15]. Tis shift pattern would also lead to reduced handovers, which are critical information-passing moments where miscommunication can occur and has the potential to damage patient care [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When long shifts were frst introduced, the assumption was that they would save money and allow deploying the workforce more efciently by reducing overlaps between shifts while increasing quality and safety of care. Tis was due to the belief that by scheduling two 12+ hour shifts instead of three 8hour shifts, patients would beneft from increased continuity of care across 24 hours [13][14][15]. Tis shift pattern would also lead to reduced handovers, which are critical information-passing moments where miscommunication can occur and has the potential to damage patient care [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%