2022
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 10th anniversary of the scientific description of the black snub‐nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus strykeri): It is time to initiate a set of new management strategies to save this critically endangered primate from extinction

Abstract: Traditionally, the genus Rhinopithecus (Milne-Edwards, 1872, Primates, Colobinae) included four allopatric species, restricted in their distributions to China and Vietnam. In 2010, a fifth species, the black snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus strykeri) was discovered in the Gaoligong Mountains located on the border between China and Myanmar.Despite the remoteness, complex mountainous terrain, dense fog, and armed conflict that characterizes this region, over this past decade Chinese and Myanmar scientists have b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean food retention time in captive R. bieti is estimated to be 47 h (Kirkpatrick et al, 2001). Previous studies have hypothesized that increased time devoted to resting in snub-nosed monkeys may represent a behavioral strategy designed to minimize energy expenditure required for thermoregulation during the long cold winter and/or to increase time available to digest polysacchariderich and cellulose-rich foods such as lichen, mature leaves, and tree bark (Bissell, 2014;Ding & Zhao, 2004;Hou et al, 2018Hou et al, , 2020Olafsdottir & Ingólfsdottir, 2001;Yang et al, 2022). Fruticose lichens, principally Usnea longissimi and Bryoria spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean food retention time in captive R. bieti is estimated to be 47 h (Kirkpatrick et al, 2001). Previous studies have hypothesized that increased time devoted to resting in snub-nosed monkeys may represent a behavioral strategy designed to minimize energy expenditure required for thermoregulation during the long cold winter and/or to increase time available to digest polysacchariderich and cellulose-rich foods such as lichen, mature leaves, and tree bark (Bissell, 2014;Ding & Zhao, 2004;Hou et al, 2018Hou et al, , 2020Olafsdottir & Ingólfsdottir, 2001;Yang et al, 2022). Fruticose lichens, principally Usnea longissimi and Bryoria spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While all colobine species were studied simultaneously with correlation analysis to figure out their characteristics, R. bieti is singled out from the others due to its altitude and social group size, which, as discussed above, led to its unique body mass and SDBM pattern. Within the Rhinopithecus genus, R. bieti has the most significant SDBM (1.90); R. brelichi has 1.88 [51,89], 1.81 for R. roxellana [75], 1.75 in R. avunculus [51], and 1.65 in R. strykeri [76]. Although R. bieti's distribution latitude is not as extensive as that of R. roxellana, it is still found in the highest altitude areas, and also has the largest social group size, making a significant contribution to body mass and SDBM.…”
Section: Adult Sexual Dimorphism In Body Mass In R Bietimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high ratio of body volume to body surface area ensures maximum metabolic heat retention. Such a mechanism helps the species survive on low quality foods during long freezing periods in winter [33,75,98,99].…”
Section: Adult Sexual Dimorphism In Body Mass In R Bietimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wild population of R. roxellana, numbering ~22,500 individuals, is fragmented into three local populations in the Minshan and Qionglai Mountains (Sichuan/Gansu provinces; SG), the Qinling Mountains (Shanxi province; QL), and the Shennongjia National Nature Reserve (Hubei province; SNJ) [32] (Figure 1). Population sizes of the other species are much smaller (R. bieti ~3000 individuals [33] and R. strykeri ~950 individuals [34]). The species with the smallest population size and the highest risk of extinction are R. avunculus with less than 200 individuals [31] and R. brelichi with ~400 individuals [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%