1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-60377-8_154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 10/NL Trigger for Prophylactic Platelet Transfusion in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Prospective Comparative Multicenter Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty-nine records were reviews (Andreu 2009; Avvisati 2003; Benjamin 2002; Blajchman 2008; Buhrkuhl 2010; Casbard 2004; Cid 2007; Dzik 2004; Goodnough 2002; Goodnough 2005; Heal 2004; Heddle 2003; Heddle 2007; Jelic 2006; Levi 2002; Lordkipanidze 2009; Lozano 2003; Martel 2004; McNicol 2003; Paramo 2004; Poon 2003; Rabinowitz 2010; Rayment 2005; Razzaghi 2012; Roberts 2003; Sakakura 2003; Shehata 2009; Shen 2007; Slichter 2004; Slichter 2007; Slichter 2012; Sosa 2003; Strauss 2004; Strauss 2005; Tinmouth 2003; Wandt 2010; Wang 2005; Woodard 2002; Zeller 2014). Twenty-six studies were not RCTs (Aderka 1986; Callow 2002; Cameron 2007; Chaoui 2005; Chaurasia 2012; Decaudin 2004; Eder 2007; Elting 2002; Elting 2003; Friedmann 2002; Gil-Fernandez 1996; Gmür 1991; Greeno 2007; Hardan 1994; Lawrence 2001; Navarro 1998; Nevo 2007; Norol 1998; Paananen 2009; Sagmeister 1999; Verma 2008; Wandt 1998; Wandt 2005; Wandt 2006; Weigand 2009; Zahur 2002). Fifty-three records were secondary citations of excluded studies (cited as secondary references for the relevant excluded studies).One study was a non-human study (Velik-Salchner 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirty-nine records were reviews (Andreu 2009; Avvisati 2003; Benjamin 2002; Blajchman 2008; Buhrkuhl 2010; Casbard 2004; Cid 2007; Dzik 2004; Goodnough 2002; Goodnough 2005; Heal 2004; Heddle 2003; Heddle 2007; Jelic 2006; Levi 2002; Lordkipanidze 2009; Lozano 2003; Martel 2004; McNicol 2003; Paramo 2004; Poon 2003; Rabinowitz 2010; Rayment 2005; Razzaghi 2012; Roberts 2003; Sakakura 2003; Shehata 2009; Shen 2007; Slichter 2004; Slichter 2007; Slichter 2012; Sosa 2003; Strauss 2004; Strauss 2005; Tinmouth 2003; Wandt 2010; Wang 2005; Woodard 2002; Zeller 2014). Twenty-six studies were not RCTs (Aderka 1986; Callow 2002; Cameron 2007; Chaoui 2005; Chaurasia 2012; Decaudin 2004; Eder 2007; Elting 2002; Elting 2003; Friedmann 2002; Gil-Fernandez 1996; Gmür 1991; Greeno 2007; Hardan 1994; Lawrence 2001; Navarro 1998; Nevo 2007; Norol 1998; Paananen 2009; Sagmeister 1999; Verma 2008; Wandt 1998; Wandt 2005; Wandt 2006; Weigand 2009; Zahur 2002). Fifty-three records were secondary citations of excluded studies (cited as secondary references for the relevant excluded studies).One study was a non-human study (Velik-Salchner 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-six studies were not RCTs (Aderka 1986; Callow 2002; Cameron 2007; Chaoui 2005; Chaurasia 2012; Decaudin 2004; Eder 2007; Elting 2002; Elting 2003; Friedmann 2002; Gil-Fernandez 1996; Gmür 1991; Greeno 2007; Hardan 1994; Lawrence 2001; Navarro 1998; Nevo 2007; Norol 1998; Paananen 2009; Sagmeister 1999; Verma 2008; Wandt 1998; Wandt 2005; Wandt 2006; Weigand 2009; Zahur 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-nine citations were reviews (including four systematic reviews) (Andreu 2009; Avvisati 2003; Benjamin 2002; Blajchman 2008; Buhrkuhl 2010; Casbard 2004; Cid 2007; Dzik 2004; Goodnough 2002; Goodnough 2005; Heal 2004; Heddle 2003; Heddle 2007; Jelic 2006; Levi 2002; Lordkipanidze 2009; Lozano 2003; Martel 2004; McNicol 2003; Paramo 2004; Poon 2003; Rabinowitz 2010; Rayment 2005; Razzaghi 2012; Roberts 2003; Sakakura 2003; Shehata 2009; Shen 2007; Slichter 2004; Slichter 2007; Slichter 2012; Sosa 2003; Strauss 2004; Strauss 2005; Tinmouth 2003; Wandt 2010; Wang 2005; Woodard 2002; Zeller 2014). Twenty-six studies were not RCTs (Aderka 1986; Callow 2002; Cameron 2007; Chaoui 2005; Chaurasia 2012; Decaudin 2004; Eder 2007; Elting 2002; Elting 2003; Friedmann 2002; Gil-Fernandez 1996; Gmur 1991; Greeno 2007; Hardan 1994; Lawrence 2001; Navarro 1998; Nevo 2007; Norol 1998; Paananen 2009; Sagmeister 1999; Verma 2008; Wandt 1998; Wandt 2005; Wandt 2006; Weigand 2009; Zahur 2002). Forty-four citations were secondary citations of excluded studies (cited as secondary references for the relevant excluded studies).In three studies fewer than 80% of the participants were haematological patients, and no data were available on the haematological subgroup (Goodnough 2001; Klumpp 1999; Lu 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintaining a higher platelet count for a greater percentage of the time with highdose platelet transfusion therapy might provide better hemostasis than low-dose therapy. However, the previously discussed prophylactic platelet transfusion trigger trials, comparing triggers of 10,000 versus 20,000 platelets/ll, demonstrated no difference in hemorrhagic morbidity or mortality between the two arms of the study [4][5][6]. Furthermore, based on radiochromium-labeled red cell stool blood loss as a measure of bleeding through an intact vascular system, stool blood loss was the same whether patients were transfused prophylactically at 5,000, 10,000, or 20,000 platelets/ll (Table IV) [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Three of these studies were randomized prospective platelet transfusion trials that demonstrated that a prophylactic transfusion trigger of 10,000 platelets/ll was as effective as the more standard trigger of 20,000 platelets/ll based on hemorrhagic morbidity and mortality [4][5][6]. The lower trigger significantly reduced the number of platelets transfused and, thus, the costs of platelet therapy by at least 20 to 30%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%