2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 1.9 Å Structure of a Proteasome-11S Activator Complex and Implications for Proteasome-PAN/PA700 Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
372
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(398 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
21
372
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Near-axial contacts may coordinate substrate translocation through the central pore of the unfoldase ring and into the degradation chamber of the peptidase. Crystal structures of 20S with the heptameric ATP-independent activator PA26 also show peripheral interactions between C-terminal tails and pockets in the α ring as well as interactions between an internal activation loop in PA26 and the near-axial gating residues of the α ring (17), further supporting the possibility that bipartite recognition is a universal feature of functional interactions with the 20S peptidase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Near-axial contacts may coordinate substrate translocation through the central pore of the unfoldase ring and into the degradation chamber of the peptidase. Crystal structures of 20S with the heptameric ATP-independent activator PA26 also show peripheral interactions between C-terminal tails and pockets in the α ring as well as interactions between an internal activation loop in PA26 and the near-axial gating residues of the α ring (17), further supporting the possibility that bipartite recognition is a universal feature of functional interactions with the 20S peptidase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…2B). We then introduced a cysteine (L745C) at the X position of the C-terminal HbYX tripeptide of Cdc48*, because these residues are hypothesized to dock into a binding cleft in the 20S α ring (8,20). We introduced another cysteine (K66C) into the hydrophobic cleft of the α-subunit of 20S*.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residues suitable for cross-linking Cdc48 to 20S were identified by analyzing PA26-bound 20S structures (PDB ID codes 3JRM, 1YA7, and 3IPM) using the program Disulfide by Design (20,(29)(30)(31). For EM structural analyses, we cross-linked Cdc48 */ΔN/L745C to 20S */K66C and crosslinked Cdc48 */L745C to 20S* bearing αK33C and βT1A mutations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the means by which the 20S proteasome gate is opened by either the 19S ATPases or 11S activators appears to be quite different. Indeed, while the 11S activators induce gate opening without a major conformational change to the 20S proteasome α-subunits, 14 the 19S ATPases do so with a large 4° rotation of the entire α-ring. 15 It is conceivable, therefore, that β-sheet-rich PrP acts to inhibit the 20S proteasome by stabilizing its un-rotated, closed-gate conformation, which would reduce gate opening by the 19S ATPases, but not gate opening without α-subunit rotation by the 11S activators.…”
Section: Misfolded Prp and A Novel Mechanism Of Proteasome Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%