2018
DOI: 10.3765/sp.11.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

That’s not quite it: An experimental investigation of (non‑)exhaustivity in clefts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. The procedure and the design of the German experiment are discussed in more detail in De Veaugh-Geiss et al (2017. The procedure reported there is the same for English and Hungarian here.…”
Section: Results: a First Lookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4. The procedure and the design of the German experiment are discussed in more detail in De Veaugh-Geiss et al (2017. The procedure reported there is the same for English and Hungarian here.…”
Section: Results: a First Lookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain our findings, we analyze focus partitioning structures as anaphoric devices with specific discourse-semantic use conditions, which are identical across languages, following ideas in Horn (1981Horn ( , 2016, Delin (1992), Onea & Beaver (2009), Velleman et al (2012), Pollard & Yasavul (2016), De Veaugh-Geiss et al (2017. We claim that such constructions semantically encode an ∃-inference, often explicitly marked by means of givenness or anaphoricity markers (deaccenting, demonstratives, definites, relative markers, etc.).…”
Section: (Non-)exhaustivity In Focus Partitioning Across Languagesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their conclusion, they explicitly state that they consider the exhaustivity inference in it-clefts to be a kind of scalar implicature, and thus attribute it to a purely pragmatic source. DeVeaugh-Geiss et al (2017) offer an updated account of these findings, though their results are again somewhat inconclusive. They found that neither it-clefts nor definite pseudoclefts consistently elicited purely exhaustive interpretations, which is surprising given the regularity of assuming exhaustive interpretations for these constructions in the theoretical literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, interpretations of what should have been infelicitous uses were also reported to be acceptable some of the time. DeVeaugh-Geiss et al (2017) concluded that there must be both presuppositions and scalar implicatures at play in it-clefts and pseudoclefts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%