2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2007.01022.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thalidomide in consecutive multiple myeloma patients: single‐center analysis on practical aspects, efficacy, side effects and prognostic factors with lower thalidomide doses

Abstract: The strategy to lower thalidomide doses seems a feasible and attractive approach in MM patients, this being currently tested in prospective randomized trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maintenance doses of >200 mg were largely unachievable, and peripheral neuropathy was the main toxicity, whereas lower doses enabled more patients to stay on the drug for more prolonged periods of time with fewer side effects [89]. As anticipated with the lower doses as currently used (usually 50-200 mg/day), thalidomide was more effective when used for maintenance than for relapse [40,89]. Importantly, in this respect, two subsets of patients do not appear to benefit from thalidomide maintenance, those with 13q14 deletion (del13) and patients achieving a VGPR [40,91], which implies that for patients with del13, alternative strategies need to be developed and that thalidomide should be stopped with the achievement of a VGPR in order to reduce toxicity and the development of drug resistance.…”
Section: Maintenancementioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Maintenance doses of >200 mg were largely unachievable, and peripheral neuropathy was the main toxicity, whereas lower doses enabled more patients to stay on the drug for more prolonged periods of time with fewer side effects [89]. As anticipated with the lower doses as currently used (usually 50-200 mg/day), thalidomide was more effective when used for maintenance than for relapse [40,89]. Importantly, in this respect, two subsets of patients do not appear to benefit from thalidomide maintenance, those with 13q14 deletion (del13) and patients achieving a VGPR [40,91], which implies that for patients with del13, alternative strategies need to be developed and that thalidomide should be stopped with the achievement of a VGPR in order to reduce toxicity and the development of drug resistance.…”
Section: Maintenancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Initially given in relapsed MM as a single agent, thalidomide has been shown to induce overall response rates (ORRs) of approximately 30% [39]; however, when combined with dexamethasone and/or alkylators, increased response rates are seen [40]. As thalidomide and its analogs are more effective with earlier treatment initiation, they have been included in a variety of induction schedules with substantially lower thalidomide doses (100-200 mg/day), thereby minimizing toxicity [40][41][42].…”
Section: Thalidomide and Thalidomide Analogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the thalidomide group, thalidomide was synchronously administered orally every night during and after chemotherapy. The initial dose was 100 mg/day, increasing by 50 mg/day every week (21). The selection of the chemotherapeutic regimen and the management of chemotherapy-related side effects were similar to the control group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%