2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42979-021-00775-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thai Fake News Detection Based on Information Retrieval, Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning

Abstract: Fake news is a big problem in every society. Fake news must be detected and its sharing should be stopped before it causes further damage to the country. Spotting fake news is challenging because of its dynamics. In this research, we propose a framework for robust Thai fake news detection. The framework comprises three main modules, including information retrieval, natural language processing, and machine learning. This research has two phases: the data collection phase and the machine learning model building … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model has attained lower computational requirements and higher accuracy compared to conventional research works. In 2021, Meesad (2021) has suggested a new framework for reliable detection of fake news in the Thai language, which has consisted of three major modules. It has also composed of two stages like data collection stage and the building phase of the machine learning model.…”
Section: Fake News Detection Model Based On Non-english Existing Appr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model has attained lower computational requirements and higher accuracy compared to conventional research works. In 2021, Meesad (2021) has suggested a new framework for reliable detection of fake news in the Thai language, which has consisted of three major modules. It has also composed of two stages like data collection stage and the building phase of the machine learning model.…”
Section: Fake News Detection Model Based On Non-english Existing Appr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithmic misinformation detection can be composed of many sub-tasks, which some systems tackle independently while others attempt to solve in an end-to-end fashion. While the specifics of these tasks may evolve and change over time, we draw from Guo et al [34] to differentiate between three core (sequential) tasks: (1) Check-worthiness, which aims to spot factual claims that are worthy of fact-checking [11,31,39,45], (2) Evidence retrieval of potential evidence for identified claims [21,49,56,60,66,70,74] , and (3) verdict prediction, which aims to establish the veracity of a claim [60,63,74]. In a survey on the topic by Zhou and Zafarani [78], the authors identify how misinformation can be detected from four perspectives: (1) the false knowledge it carries; (2) its writing style; (3) its propagation patterns; and (4) the credibility of its source.…”
Section: Algorithmic Misinformation Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we evaluate eight 1 ML methods based on: Support Vector Machines (SVM) [24], Random Forest (RF) [25], Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) [26], Naive Bayes (NB) [27], Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) [28], and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) [29]. We choose these methods due to their widespread use in practical NLP classification problems [30]- [32].…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%