2014
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TFClass: a classification of human transcription factors and their rodent orthologs

Abstract: TFClass aims at classifying eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) according to their DNA-binding domains (DBDs). For this, a classification schema comprising four generic levels (superclass, class, family and subfamily) was defined that could accommodate all known DNA-binding human TFs. They were assigned to their (sub-)families as instances at two different levels, the corresponding TF genes and individual gene products (protein isoforms). In the present version, all mouse and rat orthologs have been linked … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 17 aa sequence RRERNNIAVRKSRDKAK in the basic DNA binding domain stands out in the alignment of C/EBP sequences because it is fully conserved in C/EBPα, β, δ and ε (human and mouse) ( Figure 6A). This suggests that no differences in binding affinity to a given DNA sequence exist among these C/EBPs and supports the existence of a unique C/EBP consensus sequence (Wingender et al 2015); Figure 6B). Certainly, a given C/EBP site within a promoter may be bound by different C/EBP proteins with different affinities in physiological conditions because of interactions between the C/EBP and other proteins through less conserved domains (N-terminal region or Leu-zipper).…”
Section: Isoforms Primary Structure and Main Domainsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The 17 aa sequence RRERNNIAVRKSRDKAK in the basic DNA binding domain stands out in the alignment of C/EBP sequences because it is fully conserved in C/EBPα, β, δ and ε (human and mouse) ( Figure 6A). This suggests that no differences in binding affinity to a given DNA sequence exist among these C/EBPs and supports the existence of a unique C/EBP consensus sequence (Wingender et al 2015); Figure 6B). Certainly, a given C/EBP site within a promoter may be bound by different C/EBP proteins with different affinities in physiological conditions because of interactions between the C/EBP and other proteins through less conserved domains (N-terminal region or Leu-zipper).…”
Section: Isoforms Primary Structure and Main Domainsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Data is from http://www.edgar-wingender.de/Class%201.1.html; September 22, 2014 version. (Wingender et al 2015). Note that according to this source, CHOP or C/EBPε cannot form homodimers whereas data by (Newman and Keating 2003) suggest otherwise.…”
Section: Page 56 Of 99mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In many cases, the transcriptional dysregulation is driven by altered expression levels or activity of transcription factors (TFs) (Yao et al 2015;Rhie et al 2016). There are about 2000 DNA-binding TFs in the human genome, but little is known about most of these regulators (Vaquerizas et al 2009;Wingender et al 2015). We previously identified distinct sets of TFs having increased expression associated with different cancers (Yao et al 2015;Rhie et al 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%