2006
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkj449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TFAM detects co-evolution of tRNA identity rules with lateral transfer of histidyl-tRNA synthetase

Abstract: We present TFAM, an automated, statistical method to classify the identity of tRNAs. TFAM, currently optimized for bacteria, classifies initiator tRNAs and predicts the charging identity of both typical and atypical tRNAs such as suppressors with high confidence. We show statistical evidence for extensive variation in tRNA identity determinants among bacterial genomes due to variation in overall tDNA base content. With TFAM we have detected the first case of eukaryotic-like tRNA identity rules in bacteria. An … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(113 reference statements)
3
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the G À1 residue is unique to tRNA His , there would be strong evolutionary pressure to maintain this recognition element once it had evolved. The other mechanism occurs in the clade of alphaproteobacteria in which the G À1 residue is not found, and in which the HisRS requires other recognition elements for tRNA charging (Ardell and Andersson 2006;Wang et al 2007). However, it remains possible that the G À1 residue has another role in the cell, and that recognition of this G À1 residue by HisRS evolved subsequently.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the G À1 residue is unique to tRNA His , there would be strong evolutionary pressure to maintain this recognition element once it had evolved. The other mechanism occurs in the clade of alphaproteobacteria in which the G À1 residue is not found, and in which the HisRS requires other recognition elements for tRNA charging (Ardell and Andersson 2006;Wang et al 2007). However, it remains possible that the G À1 residue has another role in the cell, and that recognition of this G À1 residue by HisRS evolved subsequently.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ac.jp/ and http:/ /dictybase.org/, respectively). For each amino acid type, duplicated sequences were removed and alignments of tRNA sequences were done using the TFAM package (Ardell and Andersson 2006). Only the COVEMF program was used: this program aligns a set of sequences to an existing alignment and takes into account both primary and secondary tRNA structures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We spotchecked several of these aberrant tRNA gene complements by examining their score distributions with TFAM 0.4 to verify that there were no viable candidates for initiator tRNA genes according to our models. All of the tRNA genes in these gene complements that we checked scored inside of the normal background distribution for the initiator tFAM model [10,12]. We believe that initiator tRNA genes may simply be missing from the genome annotations that were aggregated in tRNAdb-CE v.8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, currently available tRNA genefinders annotate all three classes as elongator tRNA Met genes [9]. The TFAM tRNA functional classifier, which uses profile-based models of whole tRNA sequences [10,11], can differentiate all three tRNA functional classes with generally high specificity and sensitivity (uniformly greater than 98% depending on data and models used) [12]. However, the tRNA Ile CAU class evolves more rapidly than other classes, so that even though the TFAM 1.4 proteobacterial-specific model generalizes well to some other bacterial phyla, this model does not generalize well to all [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%