1990
DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90281-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Textures of low carbon and titanium bearing extra low carbon steel sheets hot rolled below their AR3 temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1(b)). Further, the dynamic strain aging also results in the preferential retardation of slip on the {110}<111> system 12) resulting in the strengthening of the α fiber components at the expense of the γ fiber components 13) which is clearly evidenced in the texture of ferrite in A0 specimen (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Evolution Of Microstructure and Texture Duringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(b)). Further, the dynamic strain aging also results in the preferential retardation of slip on the {110}<111> system 12) resulting in the strengthening of the α fiber components at the expense of the γ fiber components 13) which is clearly evidenced in the texture of ferrite in A0 specimen (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Evolution Of Microstructure and Texture Duringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29) Senuma et al 34) have published results suggesting that the presence of Ti-precipitates prevents bulging. Therefore, the continuous recrystallization could be the controlling recrystallization mechanism in IF warm-rolled steels.…”
Section: Recrystallization Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In thls case, the misorientation angle between the two points 8 and 9across the grain boundary was 30'. Deformed grains of types (2), (3) and (4) hardly recrystallized at the early stage of recrystallization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Deformedgrains of types (1) and (5) Orientation change in the vicinity of grain boundaries a) between the two type (1) Figure 2b) shows a grain boundary between type (2) and (4) grains. In thls case, the misorientation angle between the two points 8 and 9across the grain boundary was 30'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%