2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture methods for evaluating meat and meat analogue structures: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 207 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of the fundamentals properties of food intended for oral consumption are based on its mechanical performance when masticated, and on the rheology of the matrix to be formed into a bolus 8 . Therefore, among the several available texture methods for the characterization of properties specific to meat, herein we propose the use of the texture profile analysis (TPA) for determining cultured meat properties 9 , 10 . Texture profile analysis is based on a double mechanical compression test to provide insight into how samples behave when chewed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the fundamentals properties of food intended for oral consumption are based on its mechanical performance when masticated, and on the rheology of the matrix to be formed into a bolus 8 . Therefore, among the several available texture methods for the characterization of properties specific to meat, herein we propose the use of the texture profile analysis (TPA) for determining cultured meat properties 9 , 10 . Texture profile analysis is based on a double mechanical compression test to provide insight into how samples behave when chewed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, mechanical measurements were made using a texturometer (EZ-Test LX, Shimadzu, Noisiel, France). According to Schreuders et al [26], instrumental techniques provide objective information on different structural variables and so can be used meaningfully to characterize the structure of meat products. The method chosen for this study was texture profile analysis (TPA) with the following conditions: sample diameter 20 mm, probe diameter 50 mm, surface detection at 0.5 N, displacement speed 20 mm/min, and double compression at 50% of the sample height.…”
Section: Effect Of the 3d Printing Process On The Print Repeatability...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, there is still a limited number of methods to evaluate the structure of meat replacing structures, especially when it comes to quantifying fibrousness. [107] A lack of standard procedure makes quantitative comparison of studies difficult.…”
Section: Fiber Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%