2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2005.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture classification with combined rotation and scale invariant wavelet features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On image regions extracted from four VisTex and Brodatz image datasets, classification results perform very well and demonstrate to be superior to those reached on the same image datasets by three recent texture classification methods found in literature (Arivazhagan et al, 2006;Muneeswaran et al, 2005;Li et al, 2003 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On image regions extracted from four VisTex and Brodatz image datasets, classification results perform very well and demonstrate to be superior to those reached on the same image datasets by three recent texture classification methods found in literature (Arivazhagan et al, 2006;Muneeswaran et al, 2005;Li et al, 2003 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Ranklets+SVM represents the proposed ranklet-based approach. Ridgelets+Dist (Arivazhagan et al, 2006), Wavelets+Dist (Muneeswaran et al, 2005), and Wavelets+SVM (Li et al, 2003) Li et al (2003) used wavelet transform and SVM (i.e., Wavelets+SVM) on a number of image regions extracted from the same 30 Brodatz images used in Test-4.As evident from the seventh and eighth rows of Tab. 1, they reached 96.34% of accuracy versus the 100.00% achieved by Ranklets+SVM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed method takes some important advantages over classical fractal signature techniques like that based on wavelets 17 or multifractal. 18 One of such advantages is that the technique here presented gathers information from frequency domain inherently, allowing the capturing of details and patterns which escapes from the conventional spatial analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, textures can be classified using a small set of filters, which gives rise to the filter selection problem. The wavelet based texture classifiers are similar to Gabor based methods with the Gabor filters replaced by the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The DWT based methods employ multiscale decomposition to extract high-frequency components from wavelet subbands for texture representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%