2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture attributes for detection of salt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 16 illustrates one section of this local dataset, and Table 2 shows the performance of various detection methods, in which the proposed GoT-based method still achieves the highest accuracy. (Berthelot et al, 2013) Detection method based on 0.9054 0.0159 20.73 Gradient Maps (Aqrawi et al, 2011) Salt Dome Detection and Tracking (Berthelot et al, 2013) Detection method based on 0.9410 0.00822 8.74 Gradient Maps (Aqrawi et al, 2011)…”
Section: Objective Comparison Of Detected Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 16 illustrates one section of this local dataset, and Table 2 shows the performance of various detection methods, in which the proposed GoT-based method still achieves the highest accuracy. (Berthelot et al, 2013) Detection method based on 0.9054 0.0159 20.73 Gradient Maps (Aqrawi et al, 2011) Salt Dome Detection and Tracking (Berthelot et al, 2013) Detection method based on 0.9410 0.00822 8.74 Gradient Maps (Aqrawi et al, 2011)…”
Section: Objective Comparison Of Detected Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berthelot et al [19] proposed a Bayesian classification approach for detecting salt bodies using a combination of seismic attributes such as dip, similarity, frequency-based attributes, and attributes based on the gray-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM). A workflow based on seismic attributes and a machine-learning algorithm (i.e., extremely random trees ensemble) that automatically detects salt domes from the SEAM dataset is presented in [20].…”
Section: B Salt Dome Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McCormack ). For example, integrating multiple attributes through machine learning techniques has proven efficient for improving interpretation accuracy (Berthelot, Solberg and Gelius ; Halpert, Clapp and Biondi ; Zheng, Kavousi and Di ; Amin and Deriche ; Guillen et al . ; Qi et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%