2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture analysis of the microstructure of internal curing concrete based on image recognition technology

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydrated products, CSH and MSH together can be observed as a dense non crystalline matrix. In the image of DC40, more flaky nature of hydrated product of dolomite can be observed [29][30][31][32][33][34]. The unreacted dolomite powder crystals can be seen in the images of DC50, DC60 and DC70.…”
Section: Sem Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The hydrated products, CSH and MSH together can be observed as a dense non crystalline matrix. In the image of DC40, more flaky nature of hydrated product of dolomite can be observed [29][30][31][32][33][34]. The unreacted dolomite powder crystals can be seen in the images of DC50, DC60 and DC70.…”
Section: Sem Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The gray-level co-occurrence matrix has many characteristic parameters. Haralick et al defined 14 gray-level co-occurrence matrix parameters for texture analysis [9], of which entropy is a parameter representing the texture thickness, complexity, and the amount of information contained in the image, and angular second moment is a parameter representing the uniformity of gray pixel distribution.…”
Section: Evaluation Characteristic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have proposed several methods to identify defects in concrete structures, which require manual processing to extract defect features from images, including sample feature representation based on image grayscale statistical distribution (Guo et al, 2022), threshold segmentation methods (Kim et al, 2017), and traditional machine learning methods (Hsieh and Tsai, 2020). These methods can obtain the size and distribution of defects, however, most of them are through pixel changes and lack of sufficient extraction of the background and features of the defect information in images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%