Textual Deixis and the ‘Anchoring’ Use of the Latin Pronoun hic

Abstract

This article evaluates the results of prior research on anaphoric reference in Latin, and tries to account for the various observations within a single explanatory framework. This framework combines insights from cognitive linguistic theory and from ongoing empirical research on the linguistic marking of discourse organization in Latin. After a brief discussion of recent cognitive linguistic views on the relation between deixis and anaphora, I concentrate on the various uses of the Latin demonstrativehicin Virgil’sAeneid. The examples discussed show thathic’s deictic aspect of proximity can be discerned in all its uses, the variety of which can best be described in terms of a ‘cline’, running from canonical deixis to canonical anaphora. It is argued that in its anaphoric use, Latinhicbehaves as a linguistic ‘anchoring’ device, and is used as part of a communicative strategy referred to as‘reculer pour mieux sauter’.

Old Is the New New: The Rhetoric of Anchoring Innovation

“…to the common ground. Examples are the use of the so-called historical present tense (praesens historicum) (Kroon 2015), the use of anaphoric deictic pronouns (Kroon 2017) and the use of discourse particles and negation, understood as "the speaker's instruction to the addressee specifying in which way new information is to be cognitively anchored to the already established common ground" (Allan and van Gils 2015;van Gils 2016;Allan 2017). 3 The Latin particle enim, for instance, can be used to introduce an explanation ("for") of what has just been said before, while also suggesting that this information is already shared between speaker and addressee and thus part of the common ground ("for, as we both know").…”