Kanon Macht Kultur 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-476-05564-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Textkörper und Textbedeutung. Über die Aggregatszustände von Literatur, mit einigen Beispielen aus der Geschichte des Faust-Stoffes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only six of the contributions treat canon in the dominant Anglophone mode, that is, by discussing it in terms of race, class, and gender. Only a few of the other contributions completely disregard the Anglophone cultural studies perspective; most of them try to reconcile it with aesthetic questions (Assmann 1998;Eibl 1998;Winko 1998). The consensus among the contributors seems to be that, as the title of the volume implies, canon is a more complex phenomenon than previously acknowledged.…”
Section: Canon Debate(s)mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only six of the contributions treat canon in the dominant Anglophone mode, that is, by discussing it in terms of race, class, and gender. Only a few of the other contributions completely disregard the Anglophone cultural studies perspective; most of them try to reconcile it with aesthetic questions (Assmann 1998;Eibl 1998;Winko 1998). The consensus among the contributors seems to be that, as the title of the volume implies, canon is a more complex phenomenon than previously acknowledged.…”
Section: Canon Debate(s)mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The second line aims at identifying essential categories of canonization, usually deriving them from Immanuel Kant's notion of the aesthetic autonomy of art in Kritik der Urteilskraft (Critique of Judgment ) (1968 [1790]). Manfred Engel (2007: 31) thus identifies in canonization the aspects of formal quality, coherence, complexity, and semantic polyvalence, a list sometimes reduced to a single factor (complexity in Eibl 1998: 69 or polyvalence in Specht 2012. But this article will focus on the third, pragmatist line of inquiry.…”
Section: Canon Debate(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La nozione di "canone selvaggio" (wilder Kanon) è tratta daEibl (1998; 60-77) Fiorentino (2009). ha il merito di aver esteso, secondo modalità che paiono legittime e produttive, la portata di un concetto nato in riferimento alla letteratura.5 Se l'approccio di Eco ben si adatta alle opere di finzione (è nato per questo), con gli opportuni aggiustamenti potrebbe applicarsi in modo efficace, sebbene non esclusivo, anche a oggetti e personaggi del mondo reale.…”
unclassified