2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Textile wastewater treatment: Aerobic granular sludge vs activated sludge systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, biological [6,7,8] and physical-chemical processes [9,10,11] are used to remove dyes from textile wastewater. Biological processes show high efficiency in organic matter removal (about 90%) [12], but low dye degradation due to the poor biodegradability of dyes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, biological [6,7,8] and physical-chemical processes [9,10,11] are used to remove dyes from textile wastewater. Biological processes show high efficiency in organic matter removal (about 90%) [12], but low dye degradation due to the poor biodegradability of dyes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, aerobic granular systems produce a suitable effluent with high hydraulic/organic loadings and low sludge production, compared with conventionally activated sludge processes . To date, limited studies have been conducted for aerobic granular sludge formation, which is helpful in the biodegradation of dye‐containing wastewater . The Kolekar research group developed aerobic granules in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR), which can efficiently degrade reactive blue 59 and its biotransformed products were non‐toxic .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But there are problems which are inherent to an anaerobic/aerobic treatment sequence (such as the A 2 /O system) since the anaerobic transformation of toxic organic compounds is often incomplete [1][2][3][4] . The metabolites of anaerobic treatment may also be inhibitory to the methanogens themselves, resulting in declining anaerobic treatment efficiencies and adding to the load on the downstream aerobic treatment system [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . Intimate contact of aerobes with anaerobes may reduce the accumulation of toxic intermediates as the aerobes would achieve an in situ removal of these anaerobic metabolites [12,13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%