2021
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202170139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Textile‐Type Lithium‐Ion Battery Cathode Enabling High Specific/Areal Capacities and High Rate Capability through Ligand Replacement Reaction‐Mediated Assembly (Adv. Energy Mater. 36/2021)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure , to investigate the electrochemical performance and stability of the composite electrolytes in an all‐solid‐state Li‐metal battery system, EIS, rate capability, and long‐term cycling stability tests were carried out using a LiFePO 4 (LFP) cathode and Li‐metal anode. [ 40,41 ] Owing to the dramatically increased ionic conductivity of CSE‐ITO10, the all‐solid‐state Li/CSE‐ITO10/LFP cells exhibited a lower total resistance (558 Ω) than the Li/SPE/LFP cell (1330 Ω) derived from the EIS data (Figure 5a). Moreover, the Li/CSE‐ITO10/LFP cell has a significantly reduced cathode/electrolyte interfacial resistance (233.6 Ω) compared with that of the Li/SPE/LFP cell (697.3 Ω), indicating favorable charge transfer at the interface of CSE‐ITO10 and the LFP cathode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure , to investigate the electrochemical performance and stability of the composite electrolytes in an all‐solid‐state Li‐metal battery system, EIS, rate capability, and long‐term cycling stability tests were carried out using a LiFePO 4 (LFP) cathode and Li‐metal anode. [ 40,41 ] Owing to the dramatically increased ionic conductivity of CSE‐ITO10, the all‐solid‐state Li/CSE‐ITO10/LFP cells exhibited a lower total resistance (558 Ω) than the Li/SPE/LFP cell (1330 Ω) derived from the EIS data (Figure 5a). Moreover, the Li/CSE‐ITO10/LFP cell has a significantly reduced cathode/electrolyte interfacial resistance (233.6 Ω) compared with that of the Li/SPE/LFP cell (697.3 Ω), indicating favorable charge transfer at the interface of CSE‐ITO10 and the LFP cathode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the slurry‐coated FCCs (denoted slurry‐FCCs) displayed nonuniform fibril structures with aggregated phases and blocked pores (Figure 3b), which occurred mainly due to the high viscosity of slurries and unfavorable interfacial interactions among electrode components. Particularly, since the aggregates of poorly conductive Fe 3 O 4 NPs and the blocked pores could severely restrict the charge transfer within electrodes and the full utilization of the large surface area of the FCCs, [ 27 ] it was reasonable to expect that the performance of slurry‐FCCs was inferior to that of the (Fe 3 O 4 NP/CCN) 20 ‐FCCs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 26 ] Besides, when porous FCCs are utilized as 3D current collectors, conventional coating methods have much trouble uniformly depositing highly concentrated and viscous slurries on entire regions ranging from the exterior to the interior of the FCCs. [ 27 ] In this case, the aggregation and segregation of electrode components due to unfavorable interfacial interactions can block the numerous voids of the porous FCCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the rough and porous nature facilitates the loading of active materials and the transport of ions. [153,154] For example, the multilayer composite electrode fabricated via the assembling of NH 2 -and COOH-functionalized CNT and dioleamidestabilized LiFePO 4 nanoparticles (DA-LFP NPs) onto the surface of cellulose textiles (C-textiles) using LbL displayed a remarkable specific capacitance of 196 mAh g −1 and high rate capability; this electrode displayed highly flexible mechanical properties since the large area surface of porous textile prevents the agglomeration or precipitation of active materials, and the excellent interface design provides better charge transfer kinetics, [20] as shown Figure 11c-f. However, the thin film structures with minimum possible defects (tens to hundreds of nanometers) are necessary to facilitate the desired charge transport, like sliver mirror reaction [155] and optoelectronic materials [156,157] onto paper.…”
Section: Cnf Sheetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. Carbon: Reproduced with permission [20]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%