1993
DOI: 10.2307/329554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Textbook Grammar: Does It Reflect Native Speaker Speech?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not to deny the usefulness of being exposed to and working with cleaned-up versions of the spoken language that lack the many ungrammaticalities, false starts, slips of the tongue, and changes of direction so prevalent in unplanned speech. Rather, I am arguing here against the oral practice of grammatical features that are not common in conversation, such as the use of subordination, prepositional phrases, nominaliiations, and attributive adjectives and nouns as described by Chafe and Danielewicz (1987), Di Vito (1991), and Glisan and Drescher (1993), for example.…”
Section: Created Equal?mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not to deny the usefulness of being exposed to and working with cleaned-up versions of the spoken language that lack the many ungrammaticalities, false starts, slips of the tongue, and changes of direction so prevalent in unplanned speech. Rather, I am arguing here against the oral practice of grammatical features that are not common in conversation, such as the use of subordination, prepositional phrases, nominaliiations, and attributive adjectives and nouns as described by Chafe and Danielewicz (1987), Di Vito (1991), and Glisan and Drescher (1993), for example.…”
Section: Created Equal?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, because most grammars still are grammars of the written language, the shift to a focus on oral skills in FL teaching has had an unhappy side-effect: Although the grammar explanations still explain the rules of the written language, the sample sentences and the exercises provided to practice the grammatical rules appear to be aimed at imitating spoken language. As a result, students engage in the oral practice of written, sometimes even arcane grammatical phenomena (e.g., Di Vito, 1991; Glisan & Drescher, 1993). This is not to deny the usefulness of being exposed to and working with cleaned-up versions of the spoken language that lack the many ungrammaticalities, false starts, slips of the tongue, and changes of direction so prevalent in unplanned speech.…”
Section: Created Equal?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How does the presentation of oral language in such instructional materials measure up to authentic oral discourse? Glisan and Drescher (1993) found that grammatical explanations in SFL textbooks generally did not reflect authentic spoken Spanish, often giving the impression that all grammatical forms are equally important in speech, while the data suggest that some grammatical forms are preferred in speech or used differently in speech than in writing. As Gilmore (2004) observes "…but to what extent should we deprive students of exposure to natural language?…”
Section: The Language Of Instructional Materialsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While such examples are representative of real usage, they lack a richer context that helps clarify and define their meaning. The critical role of context and intended meaning addressed earlier is further emphasized by research showing that longer contexts—those beyond the sentence level—are optimal for linguistic analysis (Celce‐Murcia, ; Dever, ; Glisan & Drescher, ; Halliday, ; Hymes, )…”
Section: Examining Preterite/imperfect Rules In Literary Contextsmentioning
confidence: 98%