2022
DOI: 10.3196/1864295020691262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Text+ und die GND – Community-Hub und Wissensgraph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expertise and services regarding research data management should no longer be part of every single project and in some generic aspects not even of every single discipline but will be treated in distributed teams, consortia and in the end in one distributed infrastructure. Digitales 8, 2023, 90-108 Text+ is a consortium of the NFDI for language and text-based research data (Hinrichs et al, 2022;Kett et al, 2022). The main objective of the consortium is to make discipline specific datasets sustainably accessible, linked and qualitatively (re)usable for the language -and textbased communities, but also for the entire German science system, in accordance with the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) (Wilkinson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Text+mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expertise and services regarding research data management should no longer be part of every single project and in some generic aspects not even of every single discipline but will be treated in distributed teams, consortia and in the end in one distributed infrastructure. Digitales 8, 2023, 90-108 Text+ is a consortium of the NFDI for language and text-based research data (Hinrichs et al, 2022;Kett et al, 2022). The main objective of the consortium is to make discipline specific datasets sustainably accessible, linked and qualitatively (re)usable for the language -and textbased communities, but also for the entire German science system, in accordance with the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) (Wilkinson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Text+mentioning
confidence: 99%