Abstract:In their 2009 article published in the American Journal of Political Science, Dale and Strauss (DS) introduce the Noticeable Reminder Theory (NRT) of voter mobilization, which posits that mobilization efforts that are highly noticeable and salient to potential voters, even if impersonal, can be successful. In an innovative experimental design, DS show that text messages substantially boost turnout by levels comparable to personalized mobilization strategies, challenging previous field experimental research whi… Show more
“…Without localization, SMS reminders have no effect. This contrasts with work showing the positive effects of SMS across a range of outcomes, including voter turnout (e.g., Dale and Strauss 2009;Malhotra et al 2011;Marx, Pons, and Suri 2017), savings behavior (e.g., Karlan et al 2016), and adherence to antiretroviral therapy (Pop-Eleches et al 2011). However, our findings complement Bennion and Nickerson (2011), who find that SMS messaging increases voter registration in the United States, but only once an individual possesses a voter registration form.…”
We examine the effects of national voter registration policies on voting patterns with a large-scale experimental study. Together with Kenya's electoral commission, we designed an experiment in which 1,674 communities were randomized to a status quo or treatment group, receiving civic education on voter registration, SMS reminders about registration opportunities, and/or local registration visits by election commission staff. We find little evidence that civic education improves registration. Local registration visits improve voter registration, a relationship that increases in poorer communities. Moreover, local registration increased electoral competition and vote preference diversity in down-ballot contests in the 2017 Kenyan elections. Our results suggest that status quo voter registration policies constrain political participation and competition, and that inexpensive policy changes may attenuate the effects of such constraints.
“…Without localization, SMS reminders have no effect. This contrasts with work showing the positive effects of SMS across a range of outcomes, including voter turnout (e.g., Dale and Strauss 2009;Malhotra et al 2011;Marx, Pons, and Suri 2017), savings behavior (e.g., Karlan et al 2016), and adherence to antiretroviral therapy (Pop-Eleches et al 2011). However, our findings complement Bennion and Nickerson (2011), who find that SMS messaging increases voter registration in the United States, but only once an individual possesses a voter registration form.…”
We examine the effects of national voter registration policies on voting patterns with a large-scale experimental study. Together with Kenya's electoral commission, we designed an experiment in which 1,674 communities were randomized to a status quo or treatment group, receiving civic education on voter registration, SMS reminders about registration opportunities, and/or local registration visits by election commission staff. We find little evidence that civic education improves registration. Local registration visits improve voter registration, a relationship that increases in poorer communities. Moreover, local registration increased electoral competition and vote preference diversity in down-ballot contests in the 2017 Kenyan elections. Our results suggest that status quo voter registration policies constrain political participation and competition, and that inexpensive policy changes may attenuate the effects of such constraints.
“…However, past voter turnout experiments suggest that voter mobilization efforts work differently on individuals based on their past participation records (Arceneaux & Nickerson, ; Dale & Strauss, ; Gerber & Rogers, ; Malhotra, Michelson, Rogers, & Valenzuela, ). These studies find statistically significant interactions between treatments and measures of past voter history.…”
Section: Political Participation and Internet Usementioning
The widespread adoption of the Internet offers tangible potential for increasing political participation through disseminating digital reminders to vote. This study presents three experiments in which confederates mobilize members of their networks to vote by tagging them in Facebook status updates. Relying on the technological affordances of Facebook, treatments publicize individuals' past participation or failure to vote in an ongoing election. The results show substantial increases in turnout greater than that which is usually produced by face‐to‐face methods. Findings suggest that digital media offer citizens the potential to generate tremendous gains in voter participation, and address concerns that our increasingly digitally networked society may prove harmful to democracy.
“…A citizen's voice is expressed in an ever-changing environment, and in recent years many of these changes have involved new information technologies, such as social media. Citizens who once expressed their preferences to policymakers by writing letters or telephoning now also use email, blogs, Facebook, and Twitter (Bennion & Nickerson, 2011;Dale & Strauss, 2009;Davis, 2009;Malhotra, Michelson, Rogers, & Valenzuela, 2011;Osborn, McClurg, & Knoll, 2010). Since 2008, social media technology has continued to gain popularity, and its uses have multiplied.…”
This study provides a descriptive look at the use of social media and the inequality of political voices in the context of political interest organizations. It seeks to answer the question of whether the Internet and social media allow those who were previously outside the power mainstream with respect to the broader democratic discourse to raise their voices and be heard. Overall, we find that social media does not diminish the concentration of political voices within the discourse. Rather, the evidence suggests that political voices are more concentrated when a voice is measured by the size of the online network using social media than when measured using traditional indicators, such as the number of lobbyists. Furthermore, a very small number of large organizations with large online networks (as measured by Twitter followers) are driving this high concentration of online political voices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.