First International Symposium on Control, Communications and Signal Processing, 2004. 2004
DOI: 10.1109/isccsp.2004.1296479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Text independent speaker recognition using the Mel frequency cepstral coefficients and a neural network classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A functional way to think about this filter bank is to view each filter as a histogram bin (where bins have overlap) within the frequency domain. Figure belo w gives an examp le of a mel-spaced frequency bank [4]. We have used 20 filters in my work.…”
Section: Mel-frequency Wrappi Ngmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A functional way to think about this filter bank is to view each filter as a histogram bin (where bins have overlap) within the frequency domain. Figure belo w gives an examp le of a mel-spaced frequency bank [4]. We have used 20 filters in my work.…”
Section: Mel-frequency Wrappi Ngmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MFCC is a type of wavelet in which frequency scales are placed on a linear scale for frequencies less than 1 kHz and on a log scale for frequencies above 1 kHz. MFCC is capable to capturing the important characteristic of audio signals [1] [5] [7].The complex cepstral coefficients are called the MFCC. The MFCC contain both time and frequency information of the signal and this makes them more useful for feature extraction.…”
Section: Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both spectrumbased speech features, related to the shape of the vocal tract, and prosodic features, related to the excitation of the vocal tract and the speaking style of a person. In Speaker Recognition the extraction and selection of the best parametric representation of acoustic signals is an important task in the design of any speech recognition system; it drastically affects the recognition performance [7]. There are many studies have been done on MFCC and Prosodic which tell us that the MFCC use A small set of standard features while Prosodic uses long term features.…”
Section: A Comparative Study On Mfcc and Prosodicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations