2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45100-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Text Genres and Registers: The Computation of Linguistic Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one of the limitations of the n-gram model is the fact that the method is ignorant of the grammatical nature of the text. Recently, a Part of Speech (PoS) n-gram model was used extensively for text classification [49,50]. A recent study by Liu et al [44] stated that 'further writing analytics development is needed, particularly for the feelings factor, which does not appear to be well covered by the variables we have considered here -what writing analytic features might prove to be more reliable indicators of feelings if they are denoted as important to the quality of a reflection?'(p.12).…”
Section: Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the limitations of the n-gram model is the fact that the method is ignorant of the grammatical nature of the text. Recently, a Part of Speech (PoS) n-gram model was used extensively for text classification [49,50]. A recent study by Liu et al [44] stated that 'further writing analytics development is needed, particularly for the feelings factor, which does not appear to be well covered by the variables we have considered here -what writing analytic features might prove to be more reliable indicators of feelings if they are denoted as important to the quality of a reflection?'(p.12).…”
Section: Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halliday defines register as a configuration of meanings that are typically associated with a particular situational configuration of field, mode and tenor (Halliday 1985). However, register also has a bearing on genre, in that different genres are observed to have different degree of formality (Fang, Cao 2015). In some cases, the register used in the TT features higher levels of formality than the one chosen for the ST.…”
Section: Register Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies employing bottom-up clustering methods that support prevalent register classifications notwithstanding (e.g. Gries et al 2011, Fang & Cao 2015, my own studies highlight that it would be naive to rely on these opaque register labels. This is by no means meant as criticism of the respective ICE components.…”
Section: Interim Summary and Critical Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…spoken vs. written): in this case, both POS tagsets outperform the word-based model. The experiments ofFang & Cao (2015) further show a substantial drop in the classification accuracy on finer levels of granularity: they achieve accuracy rates of 99.8% when classifying into spoken/written texts, 74.7% on a genre and a mere 58.2% on…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation