2015
DOI: 10.1088/1674-4527/15/1/002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TeV cosmic-ray proton and helium spectra in the myriad model II

Abstract: Recent observations show that the cosmic ray nuclei spectra start to harden above ∼ 10 2 GeV, in contradiction with the conventional steady-state cosmic ray model. We had suggested that this anomaly is due to the propagation effect of cosmic rays released from local young cosmic ray sources, the total flux of the cosmic ray should be computed with the myriad model, where contribution from sources in local catalogue is added to the background. However, while the hardening could be elegantly explained in this mo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical descriptions based on Galaxy-wide ensemble of discrete sources have been used to also interpret the electron data and CR nuclei fluxes (Higdon & Lingenfelter 2003;Taillet et al 2004;Mertsch 2011;Bernard et al 2012;Liu et al 2015;Miyake et al 2015;Genolini et al 2017;Mertsch 2018;Ptuskin et al 2006). Unsurprisingly given the lack of directionality for the CR fluxes and the large parametric uncertainty for such descriptions, a unique distribution of sources explaining the CR data, particularly for the high energies where spectral features are most evident, has proved elusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical descriptions based on Galaxy-wide ensemble of discrete sources have been used to also interpret the electron data and CR nuclei fluxes (Higdon & Lingenfelter 2003;Taillet et al 2004;Mertsch 2011;Bernard et al 2012;Liu et al 2015;Miyake et al 2015;Genolini et al 2017;Mertsch 2018;Ptuskin et al 2006). Unsurprisingly given the lack of directionality for the CR fluxes and the large parametric uncertainty for such descriptions, a unique distribution of sources explaining the CR data, particularly for the high energies where spectral features are most evident, has proved elusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reality is, however, otherwise with primary CRs produced in and about highly localised regions, e.g., SNRs, which have finite lifetimes. This discretised picture for the CR sources has been explored for a long time for modelling the local CR fluxes (e.g., Higdon & Lingenfelter 2003;Taillet et al 2004;Mertsch 2011Mertsch , 2018Bernard et al 2012;Liu et al 2015;Miyake et al 2015;Genolini et al 2017;Ptuskin et al 2006). However, the modelling for the ensuent broadband non-thermal emissions from ensembles of such sources across the entire MW has only been recently investigated (Porter et al 2019).…”
Section: Discretised Source Ensemble Interstellar Emission Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations of proton, helium, and heavier nuclei also show remarkable hardenings at energies above a few hundred GeV/nucleon [34][35][36][37][38][39]. The hadronic hardening may be ascribed to source model [40][41][42][43][44][45][46], transport effect [47][48][49][50][51][52], or production mechanism [53,54]. Most recently, AMS-02 collaboration released the measurements of antiproton-to-proton ratio, which shows a flat behavior up to ∼ 400 GeV [55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%