2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20991.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TeV blazar variability: the firehose instability?

Abstract: Recently observed minute timescale variability of blazar emission at TeV energies has imposed severe constraints on jet models and TeV emission mechanisms. We focus on a robust jet instability to explain this variability. As a consequence of the bulk outflow of the jet plasma, the pressure is likely to be anisotropic, with the parallel pressure $P_{||}$ in the forward jet direction exceeding the perpendicular pressure $P_{\perp}$. Under these circumstances, the jet is susceptible to the firehose instability, w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case the A-EFH develops faster, with maximum growth rates much higher than P-EFH (Li & Habbal 2000;Gary & Nishimura 2003;Camporeale & Burgess 2008;Hellinger et al 2014), and may play the main role in reducing, eventually, the free energy, and leading to enhanced fluctuations which may scatter the electrons and limit their anisotropy. It is also known that firehose instability may influence macroscopic plasma properties, like viscous heating and thermal conduction, with implications for plasma dynamics at the magnetic field reconnection sites in the heliosheath (Schoeffler et al 2011), and at larger scales in intracluster medium and accretion disks plasmas (Sharma et al 2006), and may cause disruptions in the large-scale plasma jets triggering radiative fields (Subramanian et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the A-EFH develops faster, with maximum growth rates much higher than P-EFH (Li & Habbal 2000;Gary & Nishimura 2003;Camporeale & Burgess 2008;Hellinger et al 2014), and may play the main role in reducing, eventually, the free energy, and leading to enhanced fluctuations which may scatter the electrons and limit their anisotropy. It is also known that firehose instability may influence macroscopic plasma properties, like viscous heating and thermal conduction, with implications for plasma dynamics at the magnetic field reconnection sites in the heliosheath (Schoeffler et al 2011), and at larger scales in intracluster medium and accretion disks plasmas (Sharma et al 2006), and may cause disruptions in the large-scale plasma jets triggering radiative fields (Subramanian et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Begelman et al (2008)), misaligned minijets inside the main jet (e.g. Giannios et al (2010)), jet deceleration (Georganopoulos & Kazanas 2003;Levinson 2007), wiggles in an anisotropic electron beam directed along the jet (Ghisellini et al 2009), relativistic plasma blob inside the jet (blob-in-jet model; (Katarzyński et al 2001)) and plasma instability such as firehose (Subramanian et al 2012) caused by anisotropic electron beam. Some fundamental questions regarding this source such as the content of its jet, location and mechanism of γ-ray emission and the origin of observed variability are still not answered unambiguously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high energy γ-ray photons which are emitted within the BLR, at the distance of ∼0.1 pc from the central engine, are expected to be absorbed by the UV photons emitted by H-Ly α and continuum emission of a quasar with an accretion disk luminosity above 10 45 ergs/sec. The observed rapid variability warrant more sophisticated scenarios, e.g., turbulence, multi-zone emission, or magnetic reconnection, emission from the magnetosphere of black holes [162,163,164,165].…”
Section: Mjd [Days]mentioning
confidence: 99%