1976
DOI: 10.1093/nar/3.2.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tetrahymena ribosomal RNA gene chromatin is digested by micrococcal nuclease at sites which have the same regular spacing on the DNA as corresponding sites in the bulk nuclear chromatin.

Abstract: Synchronised cells of Tetrahymena pyriformis GL were labelled with 3H thymidine at a stage in the cell cycle when only the mitochondrial and extrachromosomal nucleolar ribosomal DNAs were replicating. In this way it was possible to prepare nuclei labelled selectively in the DNA of the ribosomal RNA genes. Since the ribosomal RNA cistrons of these cells are also very active in serving as a template for transcription, experiments were performed to test whether these genes are organised upon a nucleoprotein subun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
2

Year Published

1977
1977
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results clearly indicate that the preferential digestion by DNase I of DNA which has been labeled during refeeding of starved Tetrahymena is similar in intact nuclei, isolated nuclesomes and purified nucleosome cores. It has been demonstrated that this defined starvation-refeeding scheme preferentially labels the ribosomal genes (10,11,29,42; see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results clearly indicate that the preferential digestion by DNase I of DNA which has been labeled during refeeding of starved Tetrahymena is similar in intact nuclei, isolated nuclesomes and purified nucleosome cores. It has been demonstrated that this defined starvation-refeeding scheme preferentially labels the ribosomal genes (10,11,29,42; see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There is general agreement that prestunably active ribosomal (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) and non-ribosomal (19,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) genes show both periodic and particulate structure after digestion with staphylococcal nuclease. The periodicity of the presumably active genes is indistinguishable from that of bulk chromatin (10,11,19,26). There is some controversy over whether active genes show the same susceptibility as bulk chromatin to staphylococcal nuclease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, data on cross-linking in vivo of r-chromatin from Tetrahymena with trimethylpsoralen support these results [27]. Previous results using differential labelling of rDNA in vivo [28,29] indicated that part of the total r-chromatin in a presumably active state has a nucleosomal structure. However, the observed repeat pattern of DNA fragments generated by micrococcal nuclease digestion might originate from the spacer region and not from the transcribed regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The concept of an absence of nucleosomal globules in transcribed genes of ribosomal RNAs seems to be in conflict with reports of the protection of ca. 200 base pair units of rDNA to digestion with endonuclease in macronuclei of the ciliate, Tetrahymena pyriformis Mathis & Gorovsky 1976;Piper et al 1976), and in somatic cells of Xenopus laevis (Reeves 1976;Reeves & Jones 1976). In both systems, however, the number of transcribed genes has to be regarded as unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%