1962
DOI: 10.1021/jo01055a040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tetrahydrothiophene 1,1-Dioxide Derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mixture of sulfolene 11f (150 mg, 0.09 mmol), MeOH (3 mL), and 10% Pd/C (20 mg) was degassed on the vacuum line and pressurized with H 2 (30 bar). After shaking at 25 °C for 12 h, the catalyst was filtered off, the solvent evaporated, and the residue purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (CH 2 Cl 2 ) giving 40 mg (25%) of yellowish oil identical (spectral data) with the 2-bromosulfolane prepared according to Faith et al…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mixture of sulfolene 11f (150 mg, 0.09 mmol), MeOH (3 mL), and 10% Pd/C (20 mg) was degassed on the vacuum line and pressurized with H 2 (30 bar). After shaking at 25 °C for 12 h, the catalyst was filtered off, the solvent evaporated, and the residue purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (CH 2 Cl 2 ) giving 40 mg (25%) of yellowish oil identical (spectral data) with the 2-bromosulfolane prepared according to Faith et al…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dedicated to Professor Yu-SMaCheng on the occasion of her 65th birthday. BzO""""""'" 11 INNaOH more forcing condition (IN NaOH) failed to cause the formation of either 18 or 19. Instead, compound 20 was produced in 51% yield.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%