1987
DOI: 10.1016/0223-5234(87)90172-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Tétrahydro-1,2,3,6 pyridinyl-4)-3 1H-indoles: synthèse, propriétés sérotoninergique et anti-dopaminergiques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) From a subset consisting of 15 4-THPI analogs (4-18, marked with an asterisk (*) in Table I) which vary only in their 5-substituent, Taylor et aV derived QSAR eqs 4 and 6: -6.9169 + 0.0400V5-0.0573 log (lo(l,5-23'2) + 1) (for 5-HT1A pK;) (4) pK{ = 4.4575 -0.0281 V5 + 0.9022 log P (for 5-HT2 pKj) (6) We have used these previously derived equations to predict the activity of 12 of our new compounds, 27-37 and 44, which also vary only in their indole 5-substituent (indicated) by double dagger (|) in Table I). In order to compare the predictive ability of CoMFA vs Hansch analysis, the pK, values for the above mentioned 12 compounds (27-37 and 44) and were also predicted from a separate CoMFA derived from the same subset of 15 4-THPI analogs (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). It should be noted that there are several reasons why this comparison was performed using the above eq 4 and 6 rather than eqs 5 and 7 from Taylor et al,7 which were the "best" reported equations, including a minor electronic component, with r2 values around 0.88 as opposed to around 0.75 for eqs 4 and 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) From a subset consisting of 15 4-THPI analogs (4-18, marked with an asterisk (*) in Table I) which vary only in their 5-substituent, Taylor et aV derived QSAR eqs 4 and 6: -6.9169 + 0.0400V5-0.0573 log (lo(l,5-23'2) + 1) (for 5-HT1A pK;) (4) pK{ = 4.4575 -0.0281 V5 + 0.9022 log P (for 5-HT2 pKj) (6) We have used these previously derived equations to predict the activity of 12 of our new compounds, 27-37 and 44, which also vary only in their indole 5-substituent (indicated) by double dagger (|) in Table I). In order to compare the predictive ability of CoMFA vs Hansch analysis, the pK, values for the above mentioned 12 compounds (27-37 and 44) and were also predicted from a separate CoMFA derived from the same subset of 15 4-THPI analogs (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). It should be noted that there are several reasons why this comparison was performed using the above eq 4 and 6 rather than eqs 5 and 7 from Taylor et al,7 which were the "best" reported equations, including a minor electronic component, with r2 values around 0.88 as opposed to around 0.75 for eqs 4 and 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prototype for this series of compound, RU 24969 (1, Table I), is the most thoroughly investigated of a number of derivatives of 4-THPI that have been previously examined for dopaminergic and 5-HT agonist activity. [1][2][3][4] Binding studies suggest that RU 24969 is relatively selective for 5-HTia and 5-HTib sites6'6 with lesser activity at 5-HTic, 5-HT2, and 5-HTid sites.6 '6 In a previous study,7 we used a series of 4-THPI analogs to investigate steric, electronic and hydrophobic requirements for recognition at 5-HTia and 5-HT2 receptor binding sites. In that study, the pKi values of different analogs were quantitatively related to various structural descriptors by applying a modified Hansch approach to a set of over 25 substituted 4-THPI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the THPindoles were investigated originally as serotonin and dopamine agonists (Guillaume et al, 1987), we found low binding affinities for RU 24969 and its demethyl derivative (3-THP-5-hydroxyindole) at dopamine receptors with either N- [3H]propylnorapomorphine (ICs0, 14 and 3.1 pM, respectively) or [3H]spiperone (ICsO, 10 and 2.6 pM, respectively) binding. The same two 3-THPindoles also showed very weak inhibition of [3H]prazosin ( a l ; ICs0, 5.5 and 8.7 pM, respectively) and p- son, we obtained a B,,, of 73 t 2 fmol/mg protein ( K D , 2.6 k 0.1 nM, n = 3) in rat whole-brain tissue using [3H]5-HT (Peroutka, 1986).…”
Section: Binding Profile Of Tettahydropyridylindolesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The nitrogen in the imide group of compounds 4a-4i was alkylated with 1,4-dibromobutane to form bromobutyl derivatives 5a-5i, which were subsequently hydrogenated to form 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro derivatives (6a-6i). The final compounds (8a-8u) were obtained by the condensation of bromobutyl derivatives 6a-6i with the appropriate piperidyl-indole (7a-7c) synthesized according to the method previously described [25].…”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifications were performed in the pharmacophore portion where the 3-(4-piperidyl)-1H-indole group or its 5-methoxy or 2-methyl derivative was inserted. These groups reveal the molecule's potential to inhibit the serotonin transporter (SERT) protein, as well as bind 5-HT 1A receptors [24][25][26]. The pharmacophore portion of the molecule was bound to the terminal tetrahydro-pyrido [1,2-c]pyrimidine moiety by an n-butyl chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%