2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.89.022140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tetrahedrality and structural order for hydrophobic interactions in a coarse-grained water model

Abstract: The hydrophobic interaction manifests two separate regimes in terms of size: Small nonpolar bodies exhibit a weak oscillatory force (versus distance) while large nonpolar surfaces exhibit a strong monotonic one. This crossover in hydrophobic behavior is typically explained in terms of water's tetrahedral structure: Its tetrahedrality is enhanced near small solutes and diminished near large planar ones. Here, we demonstrate that water's tetrahedral correlations signal this switch even in a highly simplified, is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To seek molecular signatures that may delineate distinct regimes of HI physics, we thus characterize hydration water structure at the initial and final equilibrium states of the pulling process (Figure ). Longstanding views have sought to understand HIs in terms of water’s unique tetrahedral correlations, and to quantify these, we calculate distributions of the angle formed by triplets of coneighboring water molecules within a 5 Å hydration shell of both the peptide and SAM surface. In bulk water this distribution peaks near the tetrahedral angle (109.5°), but surfaces and molecules can either induce enrichment or depletion of tetrahedral, random (∼90°, ideal gas-like), or icosahedral (∼60°, simple liquid-like) populations .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To seek molecular signatures that may delineate distinct regimes of HI physics, we thus characterize hydration water structure at the initial and final equilibrium states of the pulling process (Figure ). Longstanding views have sought to understand HIs in terms of water’s unique tetrahedral correlations, and to quantify these, we calculate distributions of the angle formed by triplets of coneighboring water molecules within a 5 Å hydration shell of both the peptide and SAM surface. In bulk water this distribution peaks near the tetrahedral angle (109.5°), but surfaces and molecules can either induce enrichment or depletion of tetrahedral, random (∼90°, ideal gas-like), or icosahedral (∼60°, simple liquid-like) populations .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar definition of this angle was used by Chaimovich and Shell in their work [47,48]. Integration over all possible orientations of water (over all three Euler angles) is equal to 8 π 2 .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emphasis is solely on models that provide an atomistic description of water. We note that some success has been reported recently (Chaimovich and Shell, 2014) for coarse grain models that lack any atomistic detail. Indeed, some unlikely models (Mausbach and Sadus, 2011) can qualitatively reproduce some of the water anomalies but an atomistic model is usually essential for quantitatively accurate predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%