2018
DOI: 10.1145/3197517.3201353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tetrahedral meshing in the wild

Abstract: 5.0% 2.6% 1.2% 0.6% 0.4% 0.2% 9.6% 6.8% 4.8% 3.7% 2.7% 1.5% 54.5% 26.9% 8.1% 1.9% 0.5% 0.1% 8.7% 2.1% 0.6% 0.2% 0.1% >1m >2m >4m >8m >16m >32m 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% TetGen CGAL TetWild Ours CGAL #T = 1 362 980 444s TetGen #T = 8 221 130 1705s TetWild #T = 459 626 1588s Ours #T = 278 997 291s Input #F = 392 040 Fig. 1. A mouse skull model (from micro-CT) tetrahedralized by fTetWild (right) compared with other popular tetrahedral meshing algorithms. The plot shows the percentage of models requiring more than a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
168
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For simulations that track concentrations in the volume, the conditioned surface mesh is tetrahedralized ( Fig 1E). We note that although there exist advanced tetrahedral mesh generation tools, such as TetWild [40], and others [41][42][43][44][45][46], which can generate Finite Element Analysis (FEA) compatible volume meshes from these poor quality initial surfaces, these tools are general purpose and currently not adapted to the length scales of single cells and subcellular structures. Mesh defects such as disconnects in the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) arising from the limited resolving powers of EM or errors in segmentation (e.g., Fig 2C and 2D) require more careful and often manual curation.…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simulations that track concentrations in the volume, the conditioned surface mesh is tetrahedralized ( Fig 1E). We note that although there exist advanced tetrahedral mesh generation tools, such as TetWild [40], and others [41][42][43][44][45][46], which can generate Finite Element Analysis (FEA) compatible volume meshes from these poor quality initial surfaces, these tools are general purpose and currently not adapted to the length scales of single cells and subcellular structures. Mesh defects such as disconnects in the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) arising from the limited resolving powers of EM or errors in segmentation (e.g., Fig 2C and 2D) require more careful and often manual curation.…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These classes are the focus of recent research works (e.g. [78] and [28] respectively). Many of the mechanisms employed by Hex-aLab are, in principle, extendible to them, including the filtering tools, the visualization modes, the internal data structures.…”
Section: Current Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. We note that although there exist advanced tetrahedral mesh generation tools, such as TetWild [11], which can generate Finite Element Analysis (FEA) compatible volume meshes automatically from these poor quality initial surfaces, many mesh defects are the result of the limited resolving powers of EM (e.g., Fig. 2A1, A2) and require more careful curation.…”
Section: Meshing Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%