2002
DOI: 10.1128/jb.184.8.2324-2330.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TetR Family Member PsrA Directly Binds the Pseudomonas rpoS and psrA Promoters

Abstract: We have previously described a Pseudomonas gene, psrA, which enhances transcription of the rpoS sigma factor gene at stationary phase. We present molecular data which demonstrate that in Pseudomonas putida PsrA binds specifically to the rpoS and psrA promoters in DNA regions having similar palindromic sequences, C/GAAAC N 2-4 GTTTG/C, where N is any nucleotide. The position of the initiation of transcription was determined for both promoters, and PsrA binds from positions ؊59 to ؊35 in the rpoS promoter and fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
95
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was previously shown for P. putida that PsrA regulates the expression of rpoS (Kojic & Venturi, 2001) by binding to its promoter (Kojic et al, 2002). Our results indicate a similar regulation in PCL1391.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was previously shown for P. putida that PsrA regulates the expression of rpoS (Kojic & Venturi, 2001) by binding to its promoter (Kojic et al, 2002). Our results indicate a similar regulation in PCL1391.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The organization of the rpoS gene in strain PCL1391 is comparable to that observed in other pseudomonads (Fujita et al, 1994;Heeb & Haas, 2001;Kojic et al, 1999Kojic et al, , 2002Ramos-González & Molin, 1998). A substantial difference is the presence of a putative transposase downstream of rpoS in PCL1391, whereas in many other Pseudomonas spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, given the extreme molecular parallelism observed combined with the lack of mutations in amiC (which causes a similar phenotype (Uehara et al, 2010)), it is conceivable that the adaptive contribution is not directly related to loss of nlpD activity. Instead, effects maybe attributable to changes in expression of rpoS, which in Pseudomonas putida reportedly harbours a promoter in the nlpD open reading frame, with a transcriptional start site six base pairs downstream of the nlpD mutation (Kojic et al, 2002). Effects on rpoS expression may thus constrain the mutational target and explain the parallelism.…”
Section: Evolutionary Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%