Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.4103/1817-1745.123665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tethered cord with tandem lipomyelomeningoceles, split cord malformation and thick filum

Abstract: Lipomyelomeningocele, a closed neural tube defect, usually occurs in lumbosacral area as a single lesion but can be associated with other spinal dysraphism. We report an infant with a very rare presentation of tandem lumbosacral lipomyelomeningoceles, thick filum terminale and split cord malformation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But literature reveals that the incidence of the double lipomas along with SCM type 2 is as rare as with SCM type 1 [ Table 1 ]. [ 7 8 , 22 23 ] Different unknown genetic pathways for the development of EMT and premature disjunction might be responsible for the phenomenon. It needs further genetic testing such as ARHGAP29 and RADIL genes and embryological studies and hypothesis testing to prove whether the development of double lipomas in association with SCMs are a sequel more than a chance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But literature reveals that the incidence of the double lipomas along with SCM type 2 is as rare as with SCM type 1 [ Table 1 ]. [ 7 8 , 22 23 ] Different unknown genetic pathways for the development of EMT and premature disjunction might be responsible for the phenomenon. It needs further genetic testing such as ARHGAP29 and RADIL genes and embryological studies and hypothesis testing to prove whether the development of double lipomas in association with SCMs are a sequel more than a chance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%