1991
DOI: 10.1016/0261-5606(91)90007-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of exchange market efficiency: fragile evidence from cointegration tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hungarian market appeared to be highly affected by that crisis. This finding is consistent with Schotman and Zalewska (2005) who found that the Hungarian market was the most, and the Czech market the least, sensitive to the Asian and Russian crises, an outcome that may be explained by the fact that among the three emerging markets discussed in that study, the Hungarian market had the highest foreign share ownership level and the Czech market the lowest.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The Hungarian market appeared to be highly affected by that crisis. This finding is consistent with Schotman and Zalewska (2005) who found that the Hungarian market was the most, and the Czech market the least, sensitive to the Asian and Russian crises, an outcome that may be explained by the fact that among the three emerging markets discussed in that study, the Hungarian market had the highest foreign share ownership level and the Czech market the lowest.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…More specifically, MacDonald and Taylor (1989) find cointegration for the French franc/USD and Deutsche mark/USD, while Baillie and Bollerslev (1989) assert the cointegration of their sample for seven currencies by using daily nominal spot and forward rates from March 1980 to January 1985 for Johansen's (1988) maximum likelihood technique. Sephton and Larsen (1991) suggest that the level of market efficiency is heavily sensitive to the sample period chosen; this is later confirmed by Barkoulas and Baum (1997). Lajauine and Naka (1992), employing Johansen's (1991) methodology, investigate four currencies traded in Tokyo's foreign exchange market and find evidence against Baillie and Bollerslev (1989).…”
Section: Prior Literature On the Efficiency Of The Foreign Exchange Msupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Baillie and Bollerslev (1989) find evidence of one cointegrating vector in a system of seven daily exchange rates, while Hakkio and Rush (1989) have shown that monthly spot exchange rates are not cointegrated. Sephton and Larsen (1991) demonstrated the sensitivity of these findings to sample period, with a 'rolling' test approach indicating periods during which cointegrating might be suggested by the data. The final example of non-linear cointegration will employ the Baillie and Bollerslev (1989) …”
Section: Spot Exchange Ratesmentioning
confidence: 92%