2000
DOI: 10.1017/s0266466600162024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of Common Stochastic Trends

Abstract: This paper is concerned with tests in multivariate time series models made up of random walk (with drift) and stationary components. When the stationary component is white noise, a Lagrange multiplier test of the hypothesis that the covariance matrix of the disturbances driving the multivariate random walk is null is shown to be locally best invariant, something that does not automatically follow in the multivariate case. The asymptotic distribution of the test statistic is derived for the general mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
131
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(1 reference statement)
3
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 To examine further in details the stationarity of the real estate and the current account series, Table 2 reports a summary of unit root tests, one on the individual series for each country, and another across series in the panels. In the top panel, we can see that under the null hypothesis of a unit root the rejection rates of these Nyblom-Harvey (2000) test, the test statistic can be considered as the generalization of the Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin test, and a failure to reject the null hypothesis of zero common stochastic trends is an indication that the series do not form a cointegrated combination. Applying to the panel of Real Estate/(GDP deflator) appreciation, the Levin-Lin-Chu and the Im-Pesaran-Shin tests reject the null of non-stationarity.…”
Section: Unit Root Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 To examine further in details the stationarity of the real estate and the current account series, Table 2 reports a summary of unit root tests, one on the individual series for each country, and another across series in the panels. In the top panel, we can see that under the null hypothesis of a unit root the rejection rates of these Nyblom-Harvey (2000) test, the test statistic can be considered as the generalization of the Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin test, and a failure to reject the null hypothesis of zero common stochastic trends is an indication that the series do not form a cointegrated combination. Applying to the panel of Real Estate/(GDP deflator) appreciation, the Levin-Lin-Chu and the Im-Pesaran-Shin tests reject the null of non-stationarity.…”
Section: Unit Root Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The null hypothesis is non-stationarity for the Levin-Lin-Chu (2002) test and the Im-Pesaran-Shin (2003) test. For the Nyblom-Harvey (2000) test, the test statistic can be considered as the generalization of the Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin test, and a failure to reject the null hypothesis of zero common stochastic trends is an indication that the series do not form a cointegrated combination. The test statistics correspond to specifications with time trend.…”
Section: Unit Root Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Roberts and Grimes (1997) Nyblom and Harvey (2000). 3 The test does not require any models to be estimated, even if serial correlation is present, and therefore it is particularly convenient in presence of nonlinear specifications such as that of the EKC.…”
Section: Empirical Findings and Limits To The Stability And The Genermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When individual time series are short these tests should be accompanied by bootstrap critical values (Müller-Furstenberger, Wagner and Müller, 2004) 2 . An additional test for cointegration is the one developed by Nyblom and Harvey (2000). 3 The test does not require any models to be estimated, even if serial correlation is present, and therefore it is particularly convenient in presence of nonlinear specifications such as that of the EKC.…”
Section: Empirical Findings and Limits To The Stability And The Genermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation