Although conflicting selection from different resources is thought to play a critical role in the evolution of specialized species, the prevalence of conflicting selection in generalists is poorly understood. Plants may experience conflicting selection on floral traits by different pollinators and between genders. Using artificial selection to increase phenotypic variation, we tested for conflicting and nonadditive selection on wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) flowers. To do this, we measured selection by each of the major pollinator taxa through both male and female fitness, and tested for a single-generation response to selection by a subset of these pollinators. We found some evidence for conflicting selection on anther exsertion--sweat bees exerted stabilizing selection and larger bees selected for increased exsertion. Stamen dimorphism was only under selection by honey bees, causing a response to selection in the next generation, and flower size was under similar selection by multiple pollinators. Selection differed significantly between genders for two traits, but there was no evidence for stronger selection through male fitness or for conflicting selection between genders. Our results suggest wild radish flowers can adapt to multiple pollinators, as we found little evidence for conflicting selection and no evidence for nonadditive selection among pollinators. Janzen's seminal paper, "When is it coevolution" (Janzen 1980), emphasized that selection on traits is likely more complex than simple pairwise interactions. Instead, evolution is diffuse when the selection on a given trait is dependent upon the broader community context in which a species is found (Hougen-Eitzman and Rausher 1994;Iwao and Rausher 1997;Inouye and Stinchcombe 2001). The majority of studies of diffuse evolution have measured mean fitness of the interacting species (Strauss and Irwin 2004); this does not provide any information about natural selection, defined as the slope of the relationship between fitness and a particular phenotypic trait (Strauss et al. 2005). Diffuse selection, where this slope changes depending on which species of selective agent are present, has been documented mainly in plant-herbivore systems (e.g., Pilson 1996;Juenger and Bergelson 1998;Stinchcombe and Rausher 2001) and in systems involving plant mutualists and antagonists (e.g., Gomez 2003;Cariveau et al. 2004;Irwin et al. 2004).There are at least four nonmutually exclusive ways in which multiple selective agents may affect trait evolution. First, adaptation in a heterogeneous environment may be constrained if conflicting selection by different selective agents causes a tradeoff, whereby an adaptation that is beneficial in the presence of one selective agent is deleterious in the presence of another (e.g., Irwin 2006;Lankau 2007;Gomez 2008). In an extreme example of conflicting selection, exactly opposing selection gradients could lead to no net selection on a trait (Fig. 1A). Second, multiple selective agents may select on the same trait in the same manne...