1994
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199403)41:2<171::aid-nav3220410204>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests for transient means in simulated time series

Abstract: We present a family of tests to detect the presence of a transient mean in a simulation process. These tests compare variance estimators from different parts of a simulation run, and are based on the methods of batch means and standardized time series. Our tests can be viewed as natural generalizations of some previously published work. We also include a power analysis of the new tests, as well as some illustrative examples. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If they are included in further analysis, they can cause a significant bias of the final results; see, for example, [28]. Determination of the lengths of warm-up periods can require quite elaborate statistical techniques [6,22]. When this is done, one is left with a time series of (heavily) correlated data, and with the problem of estimating the confidence intervals from such data.…”
Section: Simulation Output Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If they are included in further analysis, they can cause a significant bias of the final results; see, for example, [28]. Determination of the lengths of warm-up periods can require quite elaborate statistical techniques [6,22]. When this is done, one is left with a time series of (heavily) correlated data, and with the problem of estimating the confidence intervals from such data.…”
Section: Simulation Output Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second way, called stochastic (random) initialization, tries to estimate the steady-state probability distribution of the process, possibly from pilot runs, and then uses this estimated distribution to sample the initial conditions. Madansky (1976) shows that initializing an M/M/1 queue in empty and idle state, which is Gafarian et al (1978), Wilson and Pritsker (1978a,b), Chance (1993), Fishman (1972, Kleijnen (1984), Law (1984), Nelson (1990Nelson ( , 1992, Cash et al (1992), Ma and Kochhar (1993) Intelligent initialization Deterministic initialization Madansky (1976), Kelton and Law (1985), Kelton (1985), Murray and Kelton (1988a) Stochastic initialization Kelton (1989), Murray (1988), Murray and Kelton (1988b) Schruben (1981Schruben ( , 1982, Schruben et al (1983), Goldsman et al (1994), Vassilacopoulus (1989) Analytical techniques Kelton and Law (1983), Asmussen et al (1992), Gallagher et al (1996), White (1997), Spratt (1998), White et al (2000) the mode of the number-in-system distribution, minimizes the MSE of the point estimate. For M/M/s, M/E m /1, M/E m /2, and E m /M/2 queues, Kelton and Law (1985), Kelton (1985), and Murray and Kelton (1988a) find that initializing in a state at least as congested as the steady-state mean (as opposed to the mode) induces shorter transient periods.…”
Section: Intelligent Initializationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nelson (1992) suggests using fewer replications and longer runs per replication in the presence of initialization bias and a tight budget. Cash et al (1992) assess the tests for initial bias detection provided by Goldsman et al (1994) on analytically tractable models. They report that these tests are powerful when the bias is severe at the beginning of the sequence, and dies out quickly.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations